The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (T-Pofras)

Loading...

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

Aim: To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (T-POFRAS) in order to add this scale to the literature. Materials and Methods: A methodological study was conducted with 90 pre-terms in a neonatal intensive care unit in a state hospital. Results: The best cut-off score value was 29 from the receiver operating characteristics analysis. For the 1st observer, 100% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity were seen at a cut-off score of 29, whereas for the 2nd observer, 95.5% sensitivity and 97.8% specificity were seen. The inter-rater agreement was quite high when the two observers were divided into groups according to their cut-off scores (Kappa=0.933; p=0.0001). The inter-rater agreement was 96.7% (in 87 preterms). Conclusion: This study showed that the validity of the Turkish version of T-POFRAS was acceptable. © Copyright 2021 by Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Ege Children’s Foundation The Journal of Pediatric Research, published by Galenos Publishing House.

Description

Keywords

Enteral Nutrition, Feeding Behavior, Preterm Infant, Reliability And Validity, reliability and validity, 150, R, 610, feeding behavior, Feeding Behavior, Pediatrics, Skills Assessment, RJ1-570, preterm infant, Enteral Nutrition, Reliability And Validity, Preterm infant, enteral nutrition, Medicine, Preterm Infant, Infants, Nutrition

Fields of Science

03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
3

Volume

8

Issue

3

Start Page

225

End Page

232
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 3

Scopus : 5

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 22

SCOPUS™ Citations

5

checked on Jun 06, 2026

Page Views

40

checked on Jun 06, 2026

Downloads

29

checked on Jun 06, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.97140611

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available