The malpractices of student nurses in clinical practice in Turkey and their causes
Loading...
Date
2017
Authors
Havva Öztürk
İlknur Kahriman
Ayse Nefise Bahcecik
Serap Sökmen
Nazan Calbayram
Altundağ, Sebahat
Sibel Küçük
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PAKISTAN MEDIC AL ASSOC, PMA HOUSE, AGA KHAN III RD, KARACHI, PAKISTAN
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Abstract Objective: The study was conducted to identify whether or not student nurses made the medical errors as well as the reasons for the errors. Methods: A study was conducted with 1067 student nurses studying at 12 universities in Turkey. The data were collected by using medical error scale and a questionnaire on demographic characteristics and malpractices. Results: Overall 28% of the student nurses performed malpractice during clinical practice. Medical errors included failure of complying with sterility and asepsis rules (32%), wrong identification of patient identity (19%), and administrating wrong dosage of medications (12%). They obtained a mean score of 4.19±0.62 from the overall scale and the lowest score was 3.9±0.78 for drug administrations. Conclusion: Nursing students perform considerable amount of malpractice and they should especially improve concerning administration of drugs.
Description
Keywords
Malpractice; Nurses; Students, Nursing, Male, Medical Errors, Turkey, *Asepsis; Female; Humans; Male; Medical Errors/*statistics & numerical data; Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data; Students, Nursing/*statistics & numerical data; Surveys and Questionnaires; Turkey; Young Adult, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Medication Errors, Female, Students, Nursing, Asepsis
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0305 other medical science
Citation
SCI-Expanded
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume
67
Issue
Start Page
1198
End Page
1205
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 7
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 57
SCOPUS™ Citations
6
checked on Jun 15, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
8
checked on Jun 15, 2026
Page Views
352
checked on Jun 15, 2026
Downloads
165
checked on Jun 15, 2026
Google Scholar™



