Course and instructor characteristics distinguishing highest and lowest student ratings of instructors

Loading...

Date

2015-10-26

Authors

Ozgungor, Sevgi
Duru, Erdinc

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ani Publishing

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

Problem Statement: One way to delineate the main characteristics of effective teaching within the higher education system is to gather college students’ opinions of an effective instructor. Research based on students’ perceptions of efficient teaching revealed a series of teaching behaviors setting the distinction between good and poor teaching. However, studies also indicate differences across culture, and in Turkey, there has been little research on the topic. Purpose of Study: The goal of this study was to determine instructor and course characteristics and teaching dimensions that discriminate between instructors who received the highest and the lowest student ratings within a Turkish college setting, by incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods. Method: A total of 23,814 students across different departments in the university rated 630 instructors on a scale developed to assess students’ perceptions of instructors’ performance. In addition, students were asked to respond to an open-ended question to provide their own impressions of each instructor. Then, students’ ratings were analyzed by means of discriminative functional analysis, and written statements provided by students were analyzed via content-analysis techniques by using a combination of manual and computer-assisted methods (NVivo 9). Findings and Results: According to the quantitative analyses, although course and instructor characteristics were weak in discriminating the groups, all teaching dimensions (relationships with students, effective teaching, exams and evaluation, contribution to generic skills, class interaction, and organization and planning) were very useful in discriminating the instructors who received the best and the poorest ratings. Also, qualitative analysis revealed 4 themes consistently distinguishing the two groups: lecturing, relationship with the students, knowledge and expertise, and exams and evaluation. Conclusions and Recommendations: This study replicates the existing literature on student perceptions of effective teaching, with a culturally different, large sample. It also adds support to the notion that there are teaching behaviors, such as lecturing skills, fair evaluations, respect and interest toward students, and demonstrating expertise, that help draw the distinction between good and poor teaching in the eyes of students and that could therefore assist the improvements efforts of teacher education. © 2015, Ani Publishing. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

College teaching, Instructor effectiveness, Poor teaching, Student evaluations, Student evaluations, 330, Instructor effectiveness, 370, College teaching, Poor teaching

Fields of Science

05 social sciences, 0503 education

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
2

Source

Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research

Volume

15

Issue

61

Start Page

118

End Page

136
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 5

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 35

SCOPUS™ Citations

5

checked on Jun 12, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

4

checked on Jun 12, 2026

Page Views

125

checked on Jun 12, 2026

Downloads

437

checked on Jun 12, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
4.58

Sustainable Development Goals

NO POVERTY1
NO POVERTY
ZERO HUNGER2
ZERO HUNGER
QUALITY EDUCATION4
QUALITY EDUCATION
GENDER EQUALITY5
GENDER EQUALITY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
REDUCED INEQUALITIES10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION
LIFE ON LAND15
LIFE ON LAND
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS