Treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
17
OpenAIRE Views
24
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Objective: Delayed admission of myocardial infarction (MI) patients is an important prognostic factor. In the present nationwide registry (TURKMI-2), we evaluated the treatment delays and outcomes of patients with acute MI during the Covid-19 pandemic and compaired with a recent pre-pandemic registry (TURKMI-1). Methods: The pandemic and pre-pandemic studies were conducted prospectively as 15-day snapshot registries in the same 48 centers. The inclusion criteria for both registries were aged ?18 years and a final diagnosis of acute MI (AMI) with positive troponin levels. The only difference between the 2 registries was that the pre-pandemic (TURKMI-1) registry (n=1872) included only patients presenting within the first 48 hours after symptom-onset. TURKMI-2 enrolled all consecutive patients (n=1113) presenting with AMI during the pandemic period. Results: A comparison of the patients with acute MI presenting within the 48-hour of symptom-onset in the pre-pandemic and pandemic registries revealed an overall 47.1% decrease in acute MI admissions during the pandemic. Median time from symptom-onset to hospital-arrival increased from 150 min to 185 min in patients with ST elevation MI (STEMI) and 295 min to 419 min in patients presenting with non-STEMI (NSTEMI) (p-values <0.001). Door-to-balloon time was similar in the two periods (37 vs. 40 min, p=0.448). In the pandemic period, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreased, especially in the NSTEMI group (60.3% vs. 47.4% in NSTEMI, p<0.001; 94.8% vs. 91.1% in STEMI, p=0.013) but the decrease was not significant in STEMI patients admitted within 12 hours of symptom-onset (94.9% vs. 92.1%; p=0.075). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly increased during the pandemic period [4.8% vs. 8.9%; p<0.001; age- and sex-adjusted Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.96 (1.20-3.22) for NSTEMI, p=0.007; and 2.08 (1.38-3.13) for STEMI, p<0.001]. Conclusion: The present comparison of 2 nationwide registries showed a significant delay in treatment of patients presenting with acute MI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although PCI was performed in a timely fashion, an increase in treatment delay might be responsible for the increased risk of MACE. Public education and establishing COVID-free hospitals are necessary to overcome patients' fear of using healthcare services and mitigate the potential complications of AMI during the pandemic. © 2020 by Turkish Society of Cardiology.
Description
Keywords
Acute myocardial infarction, COVID-19, Pandemic, Total ischemic time, Treatment delay, aged, cardiogenic shock, coronary angiography, Coronavirus infection, emergency health service, female, heart failure, heart infarction, human, male, middle aged, mortality, pandemic, percutaneous coronary intervention, prognosis, register, regression analysis, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, time factor, time to treatment, treatment outcome, turkey (bird), virus pneumonia, Aged, Coronary Angiography, Coronavirus Infections, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Pandemics, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Pneumonia, Viral, Prognosis, Registries, Regression Analysis, Shock, Cardiogenic, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Time Factors, Time-to-Treatment, Treatment Outcome, Turkey, Male, Emergency Medical Services, Time Factors, Turkey, time to treatment, Treatment Delay, Myocardial Infarction, heart failure, virus pneumonia, Coronary Angiography, Total ischemic time, regression analysis, time factor, treatment delay, middle aged, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Viral, Registries, Original Investigation, emergency health service, register, St-Segment Elevation, cardiogenic shock, Shock, Middle Aged, Prognosis, aged, female, Treatment Outcome, covid-19, Regression Analysis, Female, Coronavirus Infections, Registry, heart infarction, Pneumonia, Viral, Shock, Cardiogenic, 610, Esc, acute myocardial infarction, Acute myocardial infarction, Guidelines, Time-to-Treatment, total ischemic time, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, male, Decline, turkey (bird), Coronavirus infection, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, Humans, human, Pandemics, Aged, Heart Failure, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, Pandemic, pandemic, percutaneous coronary intervention, COVID-19, Pneumonia, Treatment delay, Cardiogenic, mortality, RC666-701, treatment outcome, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, prognosis, coronary angiography, Total Ischemic Time
Fields of Science
0302 clinical medicine, 03 medical and health sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
61
Volume
24
Issue
5
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 26
Scopus : 68
PubMed : 48
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 145
SCOPUS™ Citations
69
checked on Jun 04, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
63
checked on Jun 04, 2026
Page Views
65
checked on Jun 04, 2026
Downloads
36
checked on Jun 04, 2026
Google Scholar™


