Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/60198
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEvran, Turan-
dc.contributor.authorIlhan, Seher-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T18:45:20Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-29T18:45:20Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19280-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/60198-
dc.descriptionIlhan, Seher/0000-0002-4857-8501en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose. This study aimed to assess the quality, reliability, content, and usefulness of YouTube videos related to anesthesia in geriatric and elderly patients. Methods. Using Google Trends, the most popular search terms in the past five years, "geriatric anesthesia" and "anesthesia in the elderly," were identified. A search on YouTube using these terms initially yielded 200 of the most viewed videos for each term. After applying exclusion criteria, 87 videos were included for detailed analysis. Major themes and topics related to anesthesia in geriatric and elderly patients were identified using a pre-determined qualitative thematic analysis method. The usefulness of the videos was assessed using the specially developed Geriatric and Elderly Anesthesia Usefulness Score (GAEUS). The overall quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the Modified DISCERN Scale (M-DISCERN), respectively. The average of the quality, reliability, and usefulness scores calculated by the researchers was used for consistency analysis. Results. In our study, 48.3% (42) of the videos on geriatric and elderly patients concerning anesthesia on YouTube were created by personal blogs. The quality of the videos was measured using the GQS, with a mean score of 3.34 and a median of 3 (range: 1-5), showing no significant difference according to the video source (p = 0.166). Reliability was assessed using the M-DISCERN scale, with a mean score of 3.37 and a median of 3.50 (range: 1-5), again showing no significant difference according to the video source (p = 0.097). Usefulness was measured using the GAEUS score, with a mean score of 15.30 and a median of 12.5 (range: 2-63), which showed a significant difference according to the video source (p = 0.000). The average duration of videos with low usefulness was 31.59 minutes (range: 5-44), while the average duration of moderately and highly useful videos was 59.37 minutes (range: 19.44-119.05). This duration difference was statistically significant (u = 2.569, p = 0.010). Conclusion. In our study, we examined YouTube videos covering anesthesia topics for geriatric and elderly patients. The highest usefulness scores were obtained from personal blogs; however, all sources generally showed low usefulness. The quality of the videos was assessed using the GQS, and their reliability was evaluated with the M-DISCERN. On both scales, the videos showed moderate performance across all sources. These findings indicate a need for more comprehensive and informative content on YouTube, especially for the education of healthcare professionals and patients. To better address the needs of elderly patients, the richness of content and educational value of these videos should be enhanced.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPeerj incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectContent Qualityen_US
dc.subjectElderlyen_US
dc.subjectGeriatricsen_US
dc.subjectHealth Educationen_US
dc.subjectPerioperative Careen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectUsefulnessen_US
dc.subjectVideo Analysisen_US
dc.subjectYoutubeen_US
dc.titleAnesthesia Videos in Geriatric and Elderly Patients on Youtube: Content, Quality, Reliability, and Usefulness Assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.authoridIlhan, Seher/0000-0002-4857-8501-
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.19280-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid58708814000-
dc.authorscopusid59568779600-
dc.authorwosidİlhan, Seher/Gpx-7894-2022-
dc.identifier.pmid40256732-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002713467-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001478527700001-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

62
checked on Jul 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.