Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10022
Title: | A combination of topographic and pachymetric parameters in keratoconus diagnosis | Authors: | Toprak, İbrahim Yaylalı, Volkan Yıldırım, Cem |
Keywords: | Diagnosis Index Keratoconus Maximum keratometry Pachymetry adult Article astigmatism controlled study cornea thickness corneal pachymetry diagnostic accuracy diagnostic test accuracy study female human imaging system keratoconus keratometry major clinical study male priority journal receiver operating characteristic retrospective study sensitivity and specificity adolescent algorithm classification comparative study computer assisted diagnosis evaluation study procedures reproducibility young adult Adolescent Adult Algorithms Corneal Pachymetry Corneal Topography Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted Female Humans Male Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult |
Publisher: | Elsevier | Abstract: | Purpose: To evaluate the utility of topographic and pachymetric parameters of Scheimpflug system in keratoconus diagnosis. Methods: This study included 183 eyes of 183 patients with keratoconus (keratoconus group) and 131 eyes of 131 age and sex-matched healthy subjects (control group). Mean keratometry (K, front), topographic astigmatism, pupil-center pachymetry, apical pachymetry, thinnest pachymetry (TP), corneal volume and maximum K (Kmax) were obtained from the Scheimpflug imaging system. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the diagnostic ability of each parameter in eyes with ? stage 3, ? stage 2 and stage 1 keratoconus based on the Amsler-Krumeich grading system. Results: The Kmax and TP showed the highest individual performance (with sensitivity-specificity of 92.9-92.4% and 89.6-93.3%, respectively) in diagnosis of keratoconus. The AUCs and sensitivity-specificity values for the Kmax/TP and Kmax2/TP were calculated to improve the diagnostic performance. As expected, sensitivity-specificity values significantly increased by using Kmax/TP (97.3-94.7% at the level ?0.08) and Kmax2/TP (99.5-95.7% at the level ?4.1) in discrimination of keratoconic eyes from normals. Moreover, Kmax2/TP had very high sensitivity (>99%) and specificity (>94%) in diagnosis of stage 1 and stage 2 keratoconus. Conclusions: Although Kmax and TP appear to have high diagnostic ability in keratoconus, the use of either single parameter in isolation might be unsatisfactory in differential diagnosis. Therefore, the Kmax2/TP ratio has been introduced, which reflects major characteristics of keratoconus and might be used as an important criterion in keratoconus diagnosis. © 2015 British Contact Lens Association. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.04.001 |
ISSN: | 1367-0484 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
30
checked on Oct 13, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
24
checked on Oct 31, 2024
Page view(s)
56
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.