Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10047
Title: The effects of baseline heart rate recovery normality and exercise training protocol on heart rate recovery in patients with heart failure
Authors: Yaylalı, Yalın Tolga
Fındıkoğlu, Gülin
Yurtdaş, Mustafa
Konukçu, Sibel
Şenol, Hande
Keywords: Autonomic nervous system
Cardiac rehabilitation
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
adult
Article
cardiopulmonary exercise test
clinical article
controlled study
exercise
female
heart failure
heart rate
human
male
middle aged
prospective study
randomized controlled trial
aerobic exercise
bicycle ergometry
blood pressure
diabetes mellitus
diet
exercise tolerance
heart left ventricle failure
heart rate variability
heart rehabilitation
ischemic cardiomyopathy
nonischemic cardiomyopathy
convalescence
kinesiotherapy
physiology
treatment outcome
Exercise Therapy
Female
Heart Failure
Heart Rate
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Treatment Outcome
Publisher: AVES Ibrahim Kara
Abstract: Objective: It is unclear which exercise training protocol yields superior heart rate recovery (HRR) improvement in heart failure (HF) patients. Whether baseline HRR normality plays a role in the improvement is unknown. We hypothesized that an exercise training protocol and baseline HRR normality would be factors in altering HRR in HF patients. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled and 3 group parallel study, 41 stable HF patients were randomly assigned to 3-timesweekly training sessions for 12 weeks, consisting of i) 30 minutes of interval training (IT) (n=17, 63.7±8.8 years old) versus ii) 30 minutes of continuous training (CT) (n=13, 59.6±6.8 years old) versus iii) no training (CON) (n=11, 60.6±9.9 years old). Each patient had cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after the training program. Maximum heart rates attained during the test and heart rates at 1 and 2 min (HRR1 and HRR2) during the recovery phase were recorded. Paired samples t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparisons before and after training. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis was used for comparisons among groups. Results: HRR1 was unchanged after training. HRR2 improved in the IT group after training, and post-training HRR2 values were significantly faster in the IT group than in controls. Both HRR1 and HRR2 was significantly faster, irrespective of exercise protocol in patients with abnormal baseline values after training. Conclusion: HRR1 did not improve after training. HRR2 improved only in the IT group. Both HRRs in patients with abnormal baseline values improved after both exercise protocols. IT might be superior to CT in improving HRR2. Baseline HRR might play a role in its response to exercise. © 2015 by Turkish Society of Cardiology.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10047
https://doi.org/10.5152/akd.2014.5710
ISSN: 1302-8723
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Tolga Yaylalı.pdf136.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Dec 19, 2024

Page view(s)

64
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

16
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.