Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10230
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorToprak, Selçuk-
dc.contributor.authorNacaroğlu, Engin-
dc.contributor.authorKoç, Abdullah Cem-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T13:13:58Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T13:13:58Z
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1573-6059-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/10230-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16964-4_10-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents and discusses the recent developments related to seismic performance and assessment of buried pipelines. The experience from the performance of pipelines during last earthquakes provided invaluable information and lead to new developments in the analysis and technologies. Especially, the pipeline performance during Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand is taken as a case study here. The data collected for the earthquake sequence are unprecedented in size and detail, involving ground motion recordings from scores of seismograph stations, high resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements of vertical and lateral movements after each event, and detailed repair records for thousands of km of underground pipelines with coordinates for the location of each repair. One of the important learnings from the recent earthquakes is that some earthquake resistant design and technologies proved to be working. This provides a motivation to increase international exchange and cooperation on earthquake resistant technologies. Another observation is that preventive maintenance is important to reduce the pipeline damage risk from seismic and other hazards. To increase the applicability and sustainability, seismic improvements should be incorporated into the pipe replacement and asset management programs as part of the preventive maintenance concept. However, it is also important to put in the most proper pipeline from the start as replacing or retrofitting the pipelines later requires substantial investment. In this respect, seismic considerations should be taken into account properly in the design phase. © The Author(s) 2015.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineeringen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleSeismic response of underground lifeline systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.startpage245
dc.identifier.startpage245en_US
dc.identifier.endpage263en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-16964-4_10-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84940764729en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000380534700010en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept10.02. Civil Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept10.02. Civil Engineering-
crisitem.author.dept10.02. Civil Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Selçuk Toprak.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Feb 24, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Sep 16, 2024

Page view(s)

46
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

90
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.