Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10397
Title: | Investigation of macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B resistance in staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from clinical samples by phenotypical and genotypical methods | Authors: | Ozansoy, F.A. Cevahir, Nural Kaleli, İlknur |
Keywords: | Genotype Inducible clindamycin resistance MLSB resistance Phenotype Staphylococcus aureus antiinfective agent bacterial protein lincosamide macrolide mikamycin B classification disk diffusion drug effects genetics genotype hospital patient human injury isolation and purification methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus microbiology outpatient phenotype polymerase chain reaction random amplified polymorphic DNA Staphylococcus infection trachea Anti-Bacterial Agents Bacterial Proteins Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests Humans Inpatients Lincosamides Macrolides Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Outpatients Polymerase Chain Reaction Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique Staphylococcal Infections Streptogramin Group B Trachea Wounds and Injuries |
Publisher: | Ankara Microbiology Society | Abstract: | Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common cause of both community and healthcare-associ- Ated infections. As staphylococci have developed resistance to various antibiotics, initially to penicillins then to methicillin and glycopeptides and have the ability to cause epidemics, they continue to be a major problem from past to present. Methicillin resistance gave rise to the use of alternative antibiotics such as macrolides, however worldwide development of macrolide resistance limited the use of these antibiotics. Macrolide resistance occurs either through target site modification (MLSB phenotype, encoded by erm genes), efflux pumps (MS phenotype, encoded by msrA/B genes) or decreased cell wall permeability. The aim of this study was to investigate the MLSB resistance of clinical S.aureus strains with phenotypic and genotypic methods. A total of 404 S.aureus strains isolated from different clinical samples (50% wound, 15% tracheal aspirate and 35% other samples) of inpatients (93.3%) and outpatients (6.7%) were included in the study. Double disc synergy test (D-test) was used for the phenotypical research and PCR was used for the genotypical research of MLSB resistance of isolates. One hundred fifty eight (39.1 %) of the S.aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant (MRSA), and 246 (60.9%) were methicillin-susceptible (MSSA). By the use of D-test, constitutive (cMLSB) and inducible (iMLSB) clindamycin resistance were detected in 19 and 111 isolates, respectively, while five isolates were MS phenotype and 268 isolates were S phenotype (susceptible to erythromycin and clindamycin). The resistance genes of 136 isolates with MLSB resistance phenotype were determined genotypically and among 111 isolates showing iMLSB phenotype ermA gene was found in 81.9% (83 MRSA, 8 MSSA), ermC gene in 10.8% (7 MRSA, 5 MSSA), msrA gene in 10.8% (11 MRSA, 1 MSSA), msrB gene in 1.8% (2 MRSA) and ermB gene in 0.9% (1 MRSA). Among 19 strains with cMLSB phenotype, ermA was found in 57.9% (10 MRSA, 1 MSSA), ermC in 36.8% (6 MRSA, 1 MSSA) and ermB in 15.8% (3 MRSA). Among five strains with MS phenotype, ermA was found in 80% (2 MRSA, 2 MSSA), msrA in 75% (3 MSSA), msrB in 50% (2 MSSA) and ermC in 25% (1 MSSA) of the isolates. ErmA and ermC genes were detected together in 14 isolates, ermA, ermC and msrA genes in one isolate, ermA and msrA genes in 11 isolates, ermA, msrA and msrB genes in three isolates and ermA and ermB genes in three isolates, respectively. In this study, two MRSA isolates with MS phenotype and negative D-test had only ermA gene and among two MSSA strains, erm genes were also determined in addition to msr genes. In our study RAPD-PCR method was used to investigate the clonal similarity, however no dominance of one or a number of clonal type was observed among the isolates in which the resistance genes were identified. In conclusion, the detection of MLSB resistance in S.aureus isolates is likely to influence the selection of antibiotics in the treatment of the infections caused by this bacteria. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/10397 | ISSN: | 0374-9096 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
checked on Dec 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
11
checked on Dec 19, 2024
Page view(s)
36
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.