Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/23375
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRees, AF-
dc.contributor.authorAlfaro-Shigueto, J-
dc.contributor.authorBarata, PCR-
dc.contributor.authorBjorndal, KA-
dc.contributor.authorBolten, AB-
dc.contributor.authorBourjea, J-
dc.contributor.authorBroderick, AC-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, L. M.-
dc.contributor.authorCardona, L.-
dc.contributor.authorCarreras, C.-
dc.contributor.authorCasale, P.-
dc.contributor.authorCeriani, S. A.-
dc.contributor.authorDutton, P. H.-
dc.contributor.authorEguchi, T.-
dc.contributor.authorFormia, A.-
dc.contributor.authorFuentes, M. M. P. B.-
dc.contributor.authorFuller, W. J.-
dc.contributor.authorGirondot, M.-
dc.contributor.authorGodfrey, M. H.-
dc.contributor.authorHamann, M.-
dc.contributor.authorHart, K. M.-
dc.contributor.authorHays, G. C.-
dc.contributor.authorHochscheid, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKaska, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorJensen, M. P.-
dc.contributor.authorMangel, J. C.-
dc.contributor.authorMortimer, J. A.-
dc.contributor.authorNaro-Maciel, E.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, C. K. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorNichols, W. J.-
dc.contributor.authorPhillott, A. D.-
dc.contributor.authorReina, R. D.-
dc.contributor.authorRevuelta, O.-
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSeminoff, J. A.-
dc.contributor.authorShanker, K.-
dc.contributor.authorTomas, J.-
dc.contributor.authorvan de Merwe, J. P.-
dc.contributor.authorVan Houtan, K. S.-
dc.contributor.authorVander Zanden, H. B.-
dc.contributor.authorWedemeyer-Strombel, K. R.-
dc.contributor.authorWork, T. M.-
dc.contributor.authorGodley, B. J.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-20T06:53:10Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-20T06:53:10Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1863-5407-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/23375-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3354/esr00801-
dc.description.abstractIn 2010, an international group of 35 sea turtle researchers refined an initial list of more than 200 research questions into 20 metaquestions that were considered key for management and conservation of sea turtles. These were classified under 5 categories: reproductive biology, biogeography, population ecology, threats and conservation strategies. To obtain a picture of how research is being focused towards these key questions, we undertook a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature (2014 and 2015) attributing papers to the original 20 questions. In total, we reviewed 605 articles in full and from these 355 (59%) were judged to substantively address the 20 key questions, with others focusing on basic science and monitoring. Progress to answering the 20 questions was not uniform, and there were biases regarding focal turtle species, geographic scope and publication outlet. Whilst it offers some meaningful indications as to effort, quantifying peer-reviewed literature output is ob viously not the only, and possibly not the best, metric for understanding progress towards informing key conservation and management goals. Along with the literature review, an international group based on the original project consortium was assigned to critically summarise recent progress towards answering each of the 20 questions. We found that significant research is being expended towards global priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles. Although highly variable, there has been significant progress in all the key questions identified in 2010. Undertaking this critical review has highlighted that it may be timely to undertake one or more new prioritizing exercises. For this to have maximal benefit we make a range of recommendations for its execution. These include a far greater engagement with social sciences, widening the pool of contributors and focussing the questions, perhaps disaggregating ecology and conservation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherINTER-RESEARCHen_US
dc.relation.ispartofENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCHen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSea turtle; Marine conservation; Evidence-based conservation; Systematicen_US
dc.subjectreview; Research prioritisationen_US
dc.titleAre we working towards global research priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles?en_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.startpage337-
dc.identifier.startpage337en_US
dc.identifier.endpage382en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5169-8216-
dc.identifier.doi10.3354/esr00801-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000391696900008en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationWallace, B. P.-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.openairetypeReview-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept17.02. Biology-
Appears in Collections:Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

211
checked on Feb 24, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

211
checked on Jun 27, 2024

Page view(s)

20
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.