Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/30251
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkkoç, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBardak, A.N.-
dc.contributor.authorErsöz, M.-
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, B.-
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Necmettin-
dc.contributor.authorErhan, B.-
dc.contributor.authorTunç, H.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-08T12:12:00Z
dc.date.available2020-06-08T12:12:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn1074-9357-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/30251-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2018.1555389-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Review of the literature clearly reveals that little is known about the association between functional and mental status, and Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (LUTD) in patients with stroke. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess functional and mental status in stroke patients and to identify possible associations with the prevalence, severity and bother of LUTD. Material and methods: This study was designed as a cross-sectional study and included 260 stroke patients enrolled from six different hospitals in Turkey. The patients were questioned using the Danish Prostatic Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) Questionnaire to evaluate LUTD, and evaluated using the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QoL), and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results: At least one LUTD finding was reported in 243 (93.5%) patients; the most commonly encountered complaint in these patients was nocturia (75.8%). The mean MBI, MMSE, and I-QoL scores were found to be significantly lower in LUTD (+) patients compared to LUTD (-) patients (p = 0.000, p = 0.005, and p < 0.01, respectively). Similarly all parameters (MBI, MMSE, and I-QoL scores) assessed were found to be significantly lower for patients with urinary incontinence than those without incontinence (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: LUTD is a common problem in patients with stroke. LUTD is associated with poorer cognitive and functional status and the quality of life in these patients. We, therefore, suggest that bladder dysfunction should not be overlooked during rehabilitation of stroke patients. © 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectfunctional statusen_US
dc.subjectLower urinary tract dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectstrokeen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectBarthel indexen_US
dc.subjectcerebrovascular accidenten_US
dc.subjectcross-sectional studyen_US
dc.subjectDanish Prostatic Symptom Scoreen_US
dc.subjectdisease severityen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectIncontinence Quality of Life Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectlower urinary tract symptomen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmental healthen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectMini Mental State Examinationen_US
dc.subjectModified Barthel Indexen_US
dc.subjectnocturiaen_US
dc.subjectprevalenceen_US
dc.subjectstress incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectstroke patienten_US
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)en_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectclinical trialen_US
dc.subjectcomplicationen_US
dc.subjectdementia assessmenten_US
dc.subjectmulticenter studyen_US
dc.subjectpsychologyen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectstroke rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjecturine incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studiesen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLower Urinary Tract Symptomsen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMental Status and Dementia Testsen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectStroke Rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinenceen_US
dc.titlePost-stroke lower urinary system dysfunction and its relation with functional and mental status: a multicenter cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage136
dc.identifier.startpage136en_US
dc.identifier.endpage141en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1947-4375-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10749357.2018.1555389-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid30570391en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059043340en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000461052800007en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept27.01. Electronics and Automation-
crisitem.author.dept12.02. Archaeology-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Aug 9, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Aug 9, 2024

Page view(s)

50
checked on Aug 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.