Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/36918
Title: | Which combination is most effective in women with idiopathic overactive bladder, including bladder training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial | Authors: | Fırıncı, Şule Yıldız, Necmettin Alkan, Hakan Aybek, Zafer |
Keywords: | biofeedback bladder training electrical stimulation idiopathic overactive bladder adult Article controlled study disease severity electrostimulation female frequency of voiding human idiopathic disease incontinence impact questionnaire Likert scale major clinical study micturition nocturia overactive bladder patient satisfaction prospective study quality of life questionnaire randomized controlled trial treatment response urine incontinence visual analog scale |
Publisher: | John Wiley and Sons Inc | Abstract: | Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of single and combined use of biofeedback (BF) and electrical stimulation (ES) added to bladder training (BT) on incontinence-related quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters in women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB). Material and Methods: Seventy women were randomized into four groups as follows: Group 1 received BT alone (n = 18), Group 2 received BT + BF (n = 17), Group 3 received BT + ES (n = 18), and Group 4 received BT + BF + ES (n = 17). BF and ES were performed 3 days a week, 20 min a day, a total of 24 sessions for 8 weeks. All women were evaluated in terms of incontinence severity (pad test), pelvic floor muscles strength (perineometer), 3-day voiding diary (frequency of voiding, nocturia, incontinence episodes, and number of pads), QoL (incontinence impact questionnaire), treatment success (positive response rate), cure/improvement rate, treatment satisfaction (Likert scale), and discomfort level (visual analog scale). Results: At the end of the treatment, severity of incontinence, frequency of voiding, incontinence episodes, and treatment satisfaction significantly improved in Group 3 and Group 4 compared with the other two groups. In Group 3 and Group 4, high statistically significant values were found in cure/improvement and positive response rates as opposed to Group 1 and Group 2. In Group 2 and Group 3, statistically significant improvements were seen in nocturia and QoL compared with Group 1. Moreover, statistically significant improvements in nocturia and QoL were found in Group 4 compared with the other three groups. There was no difference in the discomfort level of application between the groups. Conclusion: We conclude that in the first-line conservative treatment of women with idiopathic OAB: (i) adding BF and/or ES to BT increases treatment effectiveness, (ii) clinical efficiency is greater when the combination includes ES, (iii) BT + BF + ES (triple combination) is the most effective treatment option in reducing nocturia and improving QoL. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/36918 https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24522 |
ISSN: | 0733-2467 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
23
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
21
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Page view(s)
32
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.