Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37038
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUfuk, Furkan-
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Mahmut-
dc.contributor.authorAltınışık, Göksel-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T09:23:42Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T09:23:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/37038-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06772-2-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the previously defined six different histogram-based quantitative lung assessment (QLA) methods on high-resolution CT (HRCT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)–related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: The HRCT images of SSc patients with ILD were reviewed, and the visual ILD score (semiquantitative) and the severity of ILD (limited or extensive) were calculated. The QLA score of ILD was evaluated using the previously defined six different methods and parameters (different lung attenuation ranges, skewness, kurtosis, mean lung attenuation, and standard deviation [SD]). Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were also performed on all patients. Relationships among variables were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r). Diagnostic performance of quantitative methods for the ability to differentiate the limited from extensive ILD was calculated using ROC analysis. Results: Fifty-five patients were included in the study. There was a significant correlation between all quantitative and semiquantitative measurement results (p < 0.0001). The QLA scores revealed a significant correlation with PFT results. The kurtosis value of the voxels between - 200 and - 1024 Hounsfield unit (HU) (Method-5) showed the best correlation with semiquantitative evaluation (r = - 0.740, p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis demonstrated the best performance of SD of the voxels between - 400 and - 950 HU (Method-6) for histogram analysis method and Method-3 (voxels between - 260 and - 600 HU were calculated as ILD) for CT density cutoff methods. Conclusions: All the QLA methods are applicable in assessing the ILD score in SSc patients and have potential importance to differentiate limited from extensive ILD. Key Points: • Quantitative interstitial lung disease assessment helps clinicians to assess systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease. • Quantitative lung assessment methods are applicable in assessing the interstitial lung disease score in systemic sclerosis patients. • Quantitative lung assessment methods have potential importance in the management of patients. © 2020, European Society of Radiology.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Radiologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInterstitial lung diseasesen_US
dc.subjectMultidetector computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary function testsen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative evaluationen_US
dc.subjectSystemic sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectcorrelation coefficienten_US
dc.subjectdigital imaging and communications in medicineen_US
dc.subjectdisease severityen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectforced expiratory volumeen_US
dc.subjectforced vital capacityen_US
dc.subjecthigh resolution computer tomographyen_US
dc.subjecthistogramen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectimage analysisen_US
dc.subjectinterstitial lung diseaseen_US
dc.subjectlung function testen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmultidetector computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectquantitative analysisen_US
dc.subjectreceiver operating characteristicen_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.subjectsystemic sclerosisen_US
dc.subjecttotal lung capacityen_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectcomplicationen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectlungen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectpathophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectseverity of illness indexen_US
dc.subjectvery elderlyen_US
dc.subjectvital capacityen_US
dc.subjectx-ray computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectForced Expiratory Volumeen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLungen_US
dc.subjectLung Diseases, Interstitialen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectMultidetector Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory Function Testsen_US
dc.subjectROC Curveen_US
dc.subjectScleroderma, Systemicen_US
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Indexen_US
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computeden_US
dc.subjectVital Capacityen_US
dc.titleQuantitative computed tomography assessment for systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease: comparison of different methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage4369
dc.identifier.startpage4369en_US
dc.identifier.endpage4380en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8614-5387-
dc.authorid0000-0001-8201-9618-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-020-06772-2-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid32193641en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082846129en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000521026200003en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

50
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.