Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37045
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGülten, G.-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, B.-
dc.contributor.authorDemirkan, Neşe Çallı-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T09:23:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-02T09:23:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1792-1074-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/37045-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.11731-
dc.description.abstractDetecting the amplification and expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) is important for planning trastuzumab treatment for patients with gastric carcinoma. The present study aimed to analyse HER2 amplification and expression in primary gastric adenocarcinoma tumours and metastatic lymph nodes using microarray methods, and to assess the potential contribution of these methods to treatment planning. In total, 60 patients with lymph node metastasis were included in the present study. Microarray blocks were obtained from the tissue blocks of primary tumours and metastatic lymph nodes. HER2 expression and amplification were investigated using immunohistochemical and silver in situ hybridisation (SISH) methods, respectively. Following immunohistochemical evaluation of HER2 in primary tumours, the sensitivity and specificity of the microarray method relative to the single block method were 69 and 100%, respectively. For HER2 detection in microarray block sections from primary tumours, the sensitivity and specificity of the SISH method relative to immunohistochemistry were 56 and 100%, respectively. When using SISH in microarray blocked sections, there was a high degree of concordance (98% concordance rate) between HER2 amplification in the primary tumour and the metastatic lymph node. Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of metastatic lymph node results relative to those of the primary tumour were 100 and 98%, respectively. Overall, the single block method was more reliable compared with the microarray method for planning treatment. When microarray blocking was used, a large number of samples must be tested to ensure reliable results. The immunohistochemical method is recommended as the first step as SISH alone increases the risk of false-negative results. Assessing HER2 amplification for treatment planning would be beneficial for primary tumours, as well as metastatic lymph nodes. © This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpandidos Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOncology Lettersen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGastric carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2en_US
dc.subjectMicroarray methoden_US
dc.subjectSilver in situ hybridisationen_US
dc.subjectepidermal growth factor receptor 2en_US
dc.subjectsilveren_US
dc.subjecttrastuzumaben_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectcancer gradingen_US
dc.subjectcancer stagingen_US
dc.subjectchromosome 17en_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy studyen_US
dc.subjectdistant metastasisen_US
dc.subjectendoscopic biopsyen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectgastrectomyen_US
dc.subjectgene amplificationen_US
dc.subjectgene expressionen_US
dc.subjecthistopathologyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjecthuman tissueen_US
dc.subjectimmunohistochemistryen_US
dc.subjectin situ hybridizationen_US
dc.subjectlymph node dissectionen_US
dc.subjectlymph node metastasisen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectpredictive valueen_US
dc.subjectprimary tumoren_US
dc.subjectprotein expressionen_US
dc.subjectscoring systemen_US
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subjectstomach adenocarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectstomach carcinomaen_US
dc.subjecttissue microarrayen_US
dc.subjecttreatment planningen_US
dc.subjecttumor volumeen_US
dc.titleComparing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplification and expression using immunohistochemistry and silver in situ hybridisation in gastric carcinoma and lymph node metastasisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1897-
dc.identifier.startpage1897en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1905en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5860-100X-
dc.identifier.doi10.3892/ol.2020.11731-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid32724433en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087081517en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000563832100096en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept12.02. Archaeology-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ol_20_2_1897_PDF.pdf604.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

54
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

22
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.