Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37064
Title: Efficacy of regorafenib in the second-and third-line setting for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A real life data of multicenter study from Turkey
Authors: Hacioglu, M.B.
Kostek, O.
Karabulut, S.
Tastekin, D.
Goksu, S.S.
Alandag, C.
Akagunduz, B.
Keywords: Anti-VEGFtherapy
Chemotherapy
Disease controlrate
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Overallsurvival
Regorafenib
alpha fetoprotein
anthracycline
cisplatin
fluorouracil
gemcitabine
oxaliplatin
regorafenib
sorafenib
adult
advanced cancer
aged
alpha fetoprotein blood level
Article
cancer chemotherapy
cancer combination chemotherapy
cancer control
cancer patient
cancer survival
controlled study
drug efficacy
drug hypersensitivity
drug substitution
drug withdrawal
female
follow up
human
liver cell carcinoma
liver cirrhosis
major clinical study
male
median survival time
metastasis
overall survival
progression free survival
retrospective study
systemic therapy
treatment duration
treatment response
tumor invasion
Turkey (republic)
x-ray computed tomography
Publisher: Zerbinis Publications
Abstract: Purpose: After failure of the first-line sorafenib treatment in advanced or metastatic stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), regorafenib is one of the newly-approved targeted agents. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of regorafenib in patients with advanced HCC treated in the second- or third-line setting. Methods: In this retrospective and multicenter study, advanced HCC patients not eligible for local therapies, who received a second- or third-line regorafenib therapy after progression on the first-line sorafenib or sequential therapy with chemotherapy (CT) followed by sorafenib, were included. Results: In the first-line setting, 28 (28.9%) patients received CT and 69 (71.1%) patients received sorafenib. There were 24 (24.7%) patients who were intolerant to sorafenib. Disease control rate (DCR) was 53.6% for all patients treated with regorafenib, 62.3% in patients who received regorafenib in the second-line, and 32.1% for those receiving regorafenib in the third-line (p=0.007). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 (range; 4.3-6.9) and 8.8 (range, 6.3-11.3) months for all patients treated with regorafenib vs. 7.1 months and 10.3 months for patients who received regorafenib in the second-line vs. 5.1 and 8.7 months for patients who received regorafenib in the third-line, respectively; however, there was no statistically significant difference (pPFS=0.22 and pOS=0.85). Conclusion: Although receiving CT as a first-line therapy in advanced HCC patients did not affect the survival rates of subsequent regorafenib therapy, it might diminish the DCR of regorafenib. © 2020 Zerbinis Publications. All rights reserved.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37064
ISSN: 1107-0625
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

26
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.