Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37087
Title: | Turkish version of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument in the assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a validity and reliability study | Authors: | Kaymaz, Serdar Alkan, Hakan Karasu, Uğur Çobankara, Veli |
Keywords: | Diabetic neuropathy Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Reliability Validity adult Article correlation coefficient Cronbach alpha coefficient cross-sectional study diabetic neuropathy diabetic patient exploratory factor analysis face validity female human internal consistency major clinical study male Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Turkish version middle aged nerve conduction neurologic disease assessment neuropathic pain pain assessment predictive value priority journal psychometry receiver operating characteristic reliability scoring system sensitivity and specificity test retest reliability validity |
Publisher: | Springer | Abstract: | Background/aim: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) is a simple, brief, and useful screening tool that was designed to assess DPN. The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the MNSI and assess its reliability and validity. Materials and methods: Eighty-three patients with DM who were divided into two groups according the results of nerve conduction studies (NCS) as having DPN or without DPN were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The Toronto clinical scoring system, pain detect questionnaire, and NCS were assessed along with the MNSI. Results: Each section of the MNSI was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70), and the scores of both sections were positively correlated with total MNSI score (r = 0.938; r = 0.908, respectively, p < 0.001). The test–retest reliability of the Turkish version of the MNSI was determined as 0.99 for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.996). Using the agreement between MNSI scores and DPN diagnosis by NCS as a gold standard, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve values for section A and section B were estimated as 0.973 and 1.00, respectively. When a cut-off value ? 3.0 in section A and a cut-off value ? 2.0 in section B were used, we obtained a sensitivity of 97.6% and 100%; a specificity of 63.4% and 97.6%; a positive predictive value of 72.7% and 97.6%; and a negative predictive value of 96.3% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The Turkish version of MNSI is a reliable and valid tool for screening DPN in Turkish patients. © 2020, The Japan Diabetes Society. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/37087 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-020-00427-9 |
ISSN: | 2190-1678 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
9
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
112
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.