Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/39564
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, S-
dc.contributor.authorAtilla, R-
dc.contributor.authorTürkçüer, İbrahim-
dc.contributor.authorEritmen, UT-
dc.contributor.authorOray, NC-
dc.contributor.authorArslan, ED-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T07:15:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-28T07:15:13Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.issn2452-2473-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/39564-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of young and elderly patients in the emergency department.en_US
dc.description.abstractMaterials and Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study all patients who were admitted to emergency department (ED) during a one-month period were dichotomized into two age groups: young (between 1764 years old) and elderly (over 64 years old). Data were collected using a standard form developed for this study.en_US
dc.description.abstractResults: There were 2.105 (78%) patients in the young group and 600 (22%) patients in elderly group. In elderly group, frequency of ED visits during the six months preceding their current visit, need of monitoring, rate of consultation orders, rate of admission to hospital and length of stay in the ED were statistically higher than the young group. (37% vs. 26%, p=0.000; 41% vs. 15%, p=0.000; 41% vs. 21%, p=0,000, 18% vs. 6%, p=0.000; and 8 hours vs. 3 hours, p=0.000, respectively). In the elderly group; blood glucose, complete blood count, renal function tests and electrolytes, cardiac markers and electrocardiography were ordered more frequently than the young group. (mean, 1.87 vs. 1.26, p=0.000; 1.24 vs. 1.11, p=0.024; 1.20 vs. 1.06, p=0.013; 1.68 vs. 1.55, p=0.013 and 3.84 vs. 2.85, p=0.000, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of orders for radiological studies between two groups. The most common presenting complaint was gastrointestinal disorders in both groups. The most common final diagnosis was cardiovascular disorders in elderly population compared to non-specific symptomatic disorders in the young group (p=0.000, p=0.000, respectively).en_US
dc.description.abstractConclusion: There might be some differences according to unique characteristics of both patients and hospital during the management of geriatric patients in the emergency department. Each hospital should determine their specific requirements either for itself or for the patients and coordinate the emergency health care service according these settings.en_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINEen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGeriatric patient; young patient; emergency departmenten_US
dc.titleDifferences in management between young and elderly patients in the emergency departmenten_US
dc.title.alternativeYaşlı ve genç nüfusun acil yaklaşım farklılıklarıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage16-
dc.identifier.startpage16en_US
dc.identifier.endpage24en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000420987000004en_US
dc.ownerPamukkale_University-
item.languageiso639-1tr-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
18b649b3-7a29-4fc8-ac44-cefce4fba63f.pdf113.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

42
checked on May 27, 2024

Download(s)

10
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.