Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4163
Title: | Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography | Authors: | Karabulut, Nevzat. Boyacı, Nurefşan. Yağcı, Ahmet Baki. Herek, Duygu. Kıroglu, Yılmaz. |
Keywords: | Appendicitis Appendix Helical computed tomography Radiation exposure Ultidetector computed tomography abdomen adult aged appendectomy appendix article controlled study diagnostic accuracy female flank pain human intraabdominal fat major clinical study male priority journal radiation dose radiologist sensitivity and specificity spiral computer assisted tomography urolithiasis Adolescent Adult Aged Chi-Square Distribution Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Male Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Radiation Dosage Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, Spiral Computed Urolithiasis |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: To determine the visualization rate of the normal appendix on low- and standard-dose unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate the variables that may influence the identification of the appendix. METHODS: The study population was derived from the previous study, approved by the internal review board, investigating the effectiveness of low-dose CT (LDCT) in diagnosis of urolithiasis. Sixty-eight patients presenting with acute flank pain underwent 2 unenhanced dual-slice CT examinations. Standard-dose CT (SDCT) scans were obtained using 2 × 5-mm collimation, 120 kVp, and 170 effective mAs and followed by LDCT using 30 or 50 effective mAs. Two independent board-certified radiologists retrospectively recorded the visualization, outer diameter, and the wall thickness of normal appendices. The diameters, circumference, and cross-sectional area of the abdomen were measured. RESULTS: The prevalence of appendectomy was 8.8% (6 of 68 patients). The means of the 2 reviewers' sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for visualization of normal appendix at SDCT versus LDCT respectively were 78% versus 73%, 100% versus 92%, 100% versus 99%, 31% versus 24%, and 80% versus 74% (P = 0.39-0.75). The interobserver agreement was good at both SDCT (? = 0.61) and LDCT (? = 0.74). Overall 40% to 58% of appendices at LDCT and 33% to 47% at SDCT was larger than 6 mm. There was no significant correlation in the appendix visualization neither with abdominal dimensions nor with visceral or pericecal fat at both dose sets. The calculated mean effective radiation dose at LDCT was 70% to 82% less than SDCT. CONCLUSIONS: Low- and standard-dose nonenhanced helical CT can visualize a normal appendix with high accuracy and good interobserver agreement. The diameter of normal appendix overlaps with that of appendicitis at CT. A diameter of 10.0 mm should be considered as the upper limit of normal in the absence of any other CT signs of appendicitis. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4163 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318033c7de |
ISSN: | 0363-8715 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
22
checked on Oct 13, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
21
checked on Oct 20, 2024
Page view(s)
66
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.