Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4322
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mercan, Nazime | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guvensen, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Çelik, Ali | - |
dc.contributor.author | Katircioglu, H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-16T11:33:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-16T11:33:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1478-6419 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4322 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/14786410600906277 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The antibacterial activity of honey samples from different sources were collected and investigated against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 27736, Morganella morganii, Micrococcus luteus NRRL B-4375, Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, and Candida albicans. Pathogens exhibited different sensitivities towards the honey samples. The results showed that majority of the honey samples (75%) generally inhibitied the bacteria tested. The honey samples which were obtained from İzmir (samples 1 and 2) proved more effective as inhibitors against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. aureus. The honey which was obtained from Mugla (sample 5) exhibited high anticandidal activity on C. albicans. A comparison of the honey samples on the basis of pollen content revealed that they were heterofloral, and samples which had highest antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. aureus were dominated by pollen from Chenopodiaceae/Amaranthaceae (sample 1), and Trifolium, Trigonella, Cyperaceae, Zea mays and Anthemis taxa (sample 2). The honey proved more effective on bacteria than antibiotics. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Natural Product Research | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial activity | en_US |
dc.subject | Honey | en_US |
dc.subject | Pollen analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | antibiotic agent | en_US |
dc.subject | pollen extract | en_US |
dc.subject | Acer | en_US |
dc.subject | Amaranthaceae | en_US |
dc.subject | angiosperm | en_US |
dc.subject | Anthemis | en_US |
dc.subject | antibacterial activity | en_US |
dc.subject | antifungal activity | en_US |
dc.subject | antimicrobial activity | en_US |
dc.subject | article | en_US |
dc.subject | Bacillus cereus | en_US |
dc.subject | bean | en_US |
dc.subject | Boraginaceae | en_US |
dc.subject | Candida albicans | en_US |
dc.subject | Carduus | en_US |
dc.subject | carrot | en_US |
dc.subject | Centaurea | en_US |
dc.subject | clover | en_US |
dc.subject | controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject | Crucifera | en_US |
dc.subject | Cyperaceae | en_US |
dc.subject | dandelion | en_US |
dc.subject | drug sensitivity | en_US |
dc.subject | Ephedra | en_US |
dc.subject | Escherichia coli | en_US |
dc.subject | Euphorbia | en_US |
dc.subject | fennel | en_US |
dc.subject | fenugreek | en_US |
dc.subject | goosefoot | en_US |
dc.subject | honey | en_US |
dc.subject | Klebsiella pneumoniae | en_US |
dc.subject | maize | en_US |
dc.subject | Malva | en_US |
dc.subject | Micrococcus luteus | en_US |
dc.subject | Morganella morganii | en_US |
dc.subject | nonhuman | en_US |
dc.subject | Onopordum | en_US |
dc.subject | Papaver | en_US |
dc.subject | Plantago | en_US |
dc.subject | Poaceae | en_US |
dc.subject | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | en_US |
dc.subject | Ranunculaceae | en_US |
dc.subject | Rosaceae | en_US |
dc.subject | Rumex | en_US |
dc.subject | Sinapis | en_US |
dc.subject | Staphylococcus aureus | en_US |
dc.subject | sunflower | en_US |
dc.subject | Tribulus terrestris | en_US |
dc.subject | Turkey (republic) | en_US |
dc.subject | Vitex | en_US |
dc.subject | willow | en_US |
dc.subject | Anti-Infective Agents | en_US |
dc.subject | Bacteria | en_US |
dc.subject | Flowers | en_US |
dc.subject | Fungi | en_US |
dc.subject | Microbial Sensitivity Tests | en_US |
dc.subject | Pinus | en_US |
dc.subject | Pollen | en_US |
dc.subject | Turkey | en_US |
dc.subject | Trifolium | en_US |
dc.subject | Trigonella | en_US |
dc.subject | Zea mays | en_US |
dc.title | Antimicrobial activity and pollen composition of honey samples collected from different provinces in Turkey | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 187 | - |
dc.identifier.startpage | 187 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 195 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-8590-8381 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14786410600906277 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17365707 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-33847739813 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000245392800001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | - |
dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 17.02. Biology | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 14.02. Internal Medicine | - |
Appears in Collections: | Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Koleksiyonu PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
43
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
36
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
44
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.