Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/44789
Title: Evaluation of Paranasal Sinus Variations with Computed Tomography
Authors: Güngör, Gülay
Okur, Nazan
Keywords: Alerji;Androloji;Anestezi;Biyokimya ve Moleküler Biyoloji;Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi;Klinik Nöroloji;Yoğun Bakım, Tıp;Dermatoloji;Acil Tıp;Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma;Gastroenteroloji ve Hepatoloji;Geriatri ve Gerontoloji;Sağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri;Hematoloji;İmmünoloji;Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları;Tıbbi Etik;Tıbbi Laboratuar Teknolojisi;Genel ve Dahili Tıp;Adli Tıp;Tıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel;Mikrobiyoloji;Nörolojik Bilimler;Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum;Onkoloji;Göz Hastalıkları;Ortopedi;Kulak, Burun, Boğaz;Patoloji;Pediatri;Fizyoloji;Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri;Psikiyatri;Halk ve Çevre Sağlığı;Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp, Tıbbi Görüntüleme;Rehabilitasyon;Solunum Sistemi;Romatoloji;Spor Bilimleri;Cerrahi;Transplantasyon;Üroloji ve Nefroloji
Abstract: Introduction: Paranasal sinuses are one of the most common anatomical variations in humans. Computed tomography (CT)is an imaging modality used as the gold standard in the evaluation of patients before endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Thisstudy aims to evaluate the anatomic variations that should be considered before and during the surgical procedure by CTexamination and to determine their frequency.Methods: In this study, the images of patients who were referred to the otorhinolaryngology (ENT) outpatient clinic, consideringthat they had had sinus pathology and underwent paranasal sinus CT imaging were retrospectively analyzed. A total of320 patients aged between 15-90 years were evaluated. Non-contrast images obtained by multislice CT were examined. Thebreakdown of anatomic variations evaluated in CT sections obtained according to these protocols is presented in Table 1.Results: Of the 300 patients, 151 were male (47.2%) and 169 were female (52.8%). The mean age was 39.8±15.8 years. Themost common anatomic variation was agger nasi cell with 86.3% (n=276). The least detected anatomical variations werepneumatized inferior turbinate and bifid inferior turbinate as 0% (n=0), inferior turbinate hypoplasia as 0.3% (n=1), and bifiduncinate process variations as 0.6% (n=2).Discussion and Conclusion: Considering that a significant portion of the variations identified in this study (such as ICA protrusionand dehiscence, ethmoid roof asymmetry, Onodi cell, atelectatic UP) may lead to significant complications duringsurgery, it is important to know and describe the appearance of these variations on CT. In our study, significant variation wasobserved in the sinonasal region, and it was once again emphasized that paranasal sinus CT was very valuable in determiningthese variations.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/44789
https://doi.org/10.14744/hnhj.2019.48243
ISSN: 2630-5720
Appears in Collections:Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
HNHJ-48243-RESEARCH_ARTICLE-GUNGOR.pdf1.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

52
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

16
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.