Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4519
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorİnel, Mehmet-
dc.contributor.authorÖzmen, Hayri Baytan-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T11:34:37Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T11:34:37Z
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/4519-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017-
dc.description.abstractDue to its simplicity, the structural engineering profession has been using the nonlinear static procedure (NSP) or pushover analysis. Modeling for such analysis requires the determination of the nonlinear properties of each component in the structure, quantified by strength and deformation capacities, which depend on the modeling assumptions. Pushover analysis is carried out for either user-defined nonlinear hinge properties or default-hinge properties, available in some programs based on the FEMA-356 and ATC-40 guidelines. While such documents provide the hinge properties for several ranges of detailing, programs may implement averaged values. The user needs to be careful; the misuse of default-hinge properties may lead to unreasonable displacement capacities for existing structures. This paper studies the possible differences in the results of pushover analysis due to default and user-defined nonlinear component properties. Four- and seven-story buildings are considered to represent low- and medium- rise buildings for this study. Plastic hinge length and transverse reinforcement spacing are assumed to be effective parameters in the user-defined hinge properties. Observations show that plastic hinge length and transverse reinforcement spacing have no influence on the base shear capacity, while these parameters have considerable effects on the displacement capacity of the frames. Comparisons point out that an increase in the amount of transverse reinforcement improves the displacement capacity. Although the capacity curve for the default-hinge model is reasonable for modern code compliant buildings, it may not be suitable for others. Considering that most existing buildings in Turkey and in some other countries do not conform to requirements of modern code detailing, the use of default hinges needs special care. The observations clearly show that the user-defined hinge model is better than the default-hinge model in reflecting nonlinear behavior compatible with the element properties. However, if the default-hinge model is preferred due to simplicity, the user should be aware of what is provided in the program and should avoid the misuse of default-hinge properties. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEngineering Structuresen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear hinge propertiesen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear static procedureen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear time historyen_US
dc.subjectPlastic hinge lengthen_US
dc.subjectPushover analysisen_US
dc.subjectTransverse steel amounten_US
dc.subjectBuilding codesen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory complianceen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concreteen_US
dc.subjectStructural analysisen_US
dc.subjectStructural framesen_US
dc.subjectPlastic hinge propertiesen_US
dc.subjectConcrete buildingsen_US
dc.subjectbuildingen_US
dc.subjectmodelingen_US
dc.subjectnonlinearityen_US
dc.subjectreinforced concreteen_US
dc.subjectstructural analysisen_US
dc.titleEffects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1494
dc.identifier.startpage1494en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1502en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6750-8632-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33745959926en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000239682600002en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale_University-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept10.02. Civil Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

196
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

146
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

58
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.