Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4591
Title: The basal and TRH stimulated levels of prolactin in low risk climacteric patients with increased breast density: A matched pair case control trial
Authors: Soysal, Seyide
Soysal, M.E.
Karabulut, Nevzat
Gul, N.
Gezgin, T.
Keywords: Breast density
Mammography
Prolactin
TRH
prolactin
protirelin
adult
article
breast
breast cancer
cancer risk
climacterium
controlled study
female
high risk patient
hormone substitution
human
major clinical study
mammography
postmenopause
premenopause
prolactin blood level
risk assessment
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Case-Control Studies
Climacteric
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone
Abstract: Objective: To detect any significant alteration of basal and TRH stimulated circulating prolactin levels in those with an extremely dense breast composition as compared to ones with a fatty pattern in mammography in climacteric patients with a low risk probability for developing invasive breast cancer within five years according to a validated risk model. Materials and method: In this matched pairs case-control trial a total of 67 climacteric patients with an extremely dense breast composition were compared to a control group of 71 climacteric patients with an almost entirely fat pattern composition in terms of basal and TRH stimulated circulating prolactin levels. All participants in the study had an estimated 5 years breast cancer risk less than 1.67% according to the validated model of Gail. Subgroup analysis was done according to menopausal status (premenopausal versus postmenopausal) and according to the hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal patients (current users of HRT versus never used HRT). Results: We did not detect any statistically relevant differences between groups or subgroups in terms of basal, stimulated and ? levels (stimulated-basal) of prolactin (ng/ml). The differences between groups of extremely dense composition versus almost fatty pattern in terms of ?PRL (ng/ml) (±S.D.) were not statistically significant (68.1 ± 34.5 versus 69.1 ± 43.0; unpaired t test, Welch corrected p = 0.88, 95% CI -12.1 to 14.0). Conclusion: Our results do not suggest a contribution of circulating prolactin to increased mammographic density in climacteric patients with low risk probability to develop breast cancer. A study of similar kind is warranted in high risk patients. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4591
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.03.015
ISSN: 0378-5122
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Feb 24, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Page view(s)

64
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.