Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/46042
Title: | Radiographic assessment of bone tunnels after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografting technique | Authors: | Hatipoglu, Mustafa Yasin Bircan, Resul Ozer, Hamza Selek, Hakan Yusuf Harput, Gulcan Baltac, Yasar Gul |
Keywords: | Anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial portal bone-patellar tendon-bone hamstring tendon tunnel width Interference Screws Enlargement Grafts |
Publisher: | Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation | Abstract: | Objectives: This study aims to compare the postoperative change of femoral and tibial tunnel widths after hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografting in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery with the anteromedial portal technique. Patients and methods: This case-control and retrospective study included 39 patients (36 males, 3 females; mean age 30.17.9; range, 17 to 44 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery with either BPTB autografting method (BPTB group, n=18) or HT autografting method (HT group, n=21) between March 2014 and December 2016. Femoral fixation was achieved with bioabsorbable screw in BPTB group and endobutton in HT group. Tibial fixation was achieved with bioabsorbable interference screw in both groups. Femoral and tibial tunnel widths of groups were compared on digital radiographs. Results: When we compared the baseline values with the second-year results, the mean of femoral tunnel widths were significantly lower on radiographs at the second-year evaluation in both groups (p<0.001 for all). However, the means of tibial tunnel widths were significantly lower only in the BPTB group (p<0.001 for BPTB group and p=0.616 for HT group). Change levels of anteroposterior and lateral widths were more prominent in BPTB group than HT group (p<0.001 for all). Conclusion: Changes in tunnel widths show us superior ossification in BPTB grafting. This can be explained by superior bone-to-bone healing. As a result of radiological evaluation, we think that BPTB grafting can be more strong and durable. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.75694 https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/418154 https://hdl.handle.net/11499/46042 |
ISSN: | 2687-4784 2687-4792 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
2021-32-1-122-128-eng.pdf | 334.19 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.