Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/46434
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Sumeyye-
dc.contributor.authorKurban, Nevin Kuzu-
dc.contributor.authorTakmak, Senay-
dc.contributor.authorZeyrek, Arife Sanlialp-
dc.contributor.authorOztik, Sinem-
dc.contributor.authorSenol, Hande-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T21:11:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T21:11:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2702-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15960-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/46434-
dc.description.abstractBackground Peripheral intravenous catheterisation (PIVC) is a complex procedure. Aim This study reviewed studies evaluating the effects of different simulators in comparison with traditional methods used in PIVC training for nursing students and hospital nurses. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised (RCT) and non-randomised controlled (N-RCT) studies. Methods MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, ERIC, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched using PIVC, simulation and nursing education. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system; the risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 (for RCTs) and A Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for N-RCTs. The study was conducted as per the PRISMA guidelines. Results In total, 2,812 records were identified, and 12 studies published between 2002 and 2018 were finally included. Most studies included Virtual IV simulator and the plastic IV arm model in PIVC training for hospital nurses and nursing students, reported on outcomes such as PIVC-related knowledge, skills, confidence, state/trait anxiety and satisfaction. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis, the effect sizes for all the outcomes ranged from small to moderate. However, the effect sizes were non-significant for all outcomes. The quality of evidence was assessed as being low for skills, knowledge, satisfaction, and trait/state anxiety, and moderate for confidence. Conclusions The effect of Virtual IV training on PIVC-related skills, knowledge, satisfaction and anxiety among nursing students and hospital nurses, in comparison with the plastic arm training method, remains unclear. However, Virtual IV training was found to increase PIVC confidence. Relevance to clinical practice There is a small effect in favour of VR in PIVC education although non-significant. More evidence is needed to determine the superiority of simulation methods. In PIVC training of nurses and nursing students, hospitals and schools can choose a method in accordance with their resources. Trial registration PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019124599.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Clinical Nursingen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcatheterisationen_US
dc.subjectknowledgeen_US
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectnursing educationen_US
dc.subjectperipheralen_US
dc.subjectsimulationen_US
dc.subjectskillsen_US
dc.subjectstudentsen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectvenousen_US
dc.subjectVirtual-Realityen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectSkillsen_US
dc.subjectVenipunctureen_US
dc.subjectCannulationen_US
dc.subjectConfidenceen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of simulation-based peripheral intravenous catheterization training for nursing students and hospital nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue5-6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage483en_US
dc.identifier.endpage496en_US
dc.authoridARSLAN, SUMEYYE/0000-0001-9432-6893-
dc.authoridTakmak, Senay/0000-0002-0338-4156-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.15960-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.authorscopusid57207936872-
dc.authorscopusid26650049400-
dc.authorscopusid57211409607-
dc.authorscopusid57211406067-
dc.authorscopusid57225978513-
dc.authorscopusid56345836900-
dc.authorwosidARSLAN, SUMEYYE/AEV-9147-2022-
dc.identifier.pmid34258809en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109941737en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000673041200001en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeReview-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept11.01. Nursing-
crisitem.author.dept11.01. Nursing-
crisitem.author.dept11.01. Nursing-
crisitem.author.dept14.03. Basic Medical Sciences-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

98
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.