Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/46437
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaygisiz, Onur-
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Yavuz Mert-
dc.contributor.authorCicek, Mehmet Cagatay-
dc.contributor.authorCelen, Sinan-
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Burhan-
dc.contributor.authorKilicarslan, Hakan-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T21:11:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T21:11:38Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1092-6429-
dc.identifier.issn1557-9034-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0090-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/46437-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy with ureteroscopy (URS) was a safe and successful treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones. We aimed to comparatively evaluate the outcomes of 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors in pediatric ureter stones. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 55 children who underwent ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy to treat ureter stone size up to 15 mm between September 2009 and March 2020. Groups were formed according to the laser lithotriptor power 15 W (Group 15: n = 32), 30 W (Group 30: n = 23). The efficiency of laser lithotriptors was compared between the groups. Results: The age, gender, and stone characteristics (longest stone diameter, density, location and multiple stones) were similar between the groups. In the postop first month, stone-free status was achieved in all cases except one child in Group 15. The median operative time was significantly shorter in Group 30 (40 minutes) than in Group 15 (52.5 minutes) (P = .010). Clavien-Dindo class (CDC) 2 complications occurred in 2 children in both groups (P = .597). Although ureteric stenosis was observed in 1 patient in Group 15, no ureteric stenosis was seen in Group 30 during follow-up (median 16.1 months). Length of hospital stay (LoHS) and stone-free rates were similar between groups. Conclusion: URS with 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors is an effective treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones with a high success rate and low complication rates. In brief, 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors should be preferred over 15 W lithotriptors due to their shorter operative time with similar success rate.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniquesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectureteroscopyen_US
dc.subjectlaser lithotripsyen_US
dc.subjectpediatric ureter stoneen_US
dc.subjectlaser poweren_US
dc.title15 and 30 W Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotriptor in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Which One Is More Effective and Safe?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage839en_US
dc.identifier.endpage842en_US
dc.authoridAydin, Yavuz Mert/0000-0002-6287-6767-
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/lap.2021.0090-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid57226077284-
dc.authorscopusid57226095635-
dc.authorscopusid57204319673-
dc.authorscopusid54402299400-
dc.authorscopusid36113105900-
dc.authorscopusid57226078411-
dc.identifier.pmid33956528en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85110391190en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000648078300001en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Dec 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Dec 18, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.