Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47341
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYavuz N.-
dc.contributor.authorKarkin N.-
dc.contributor.authorYildiz M.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T21:24:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-09T21:24:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2512-1812-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92945-9_15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/47341-
dc.description.abstractAs governments are increasingly adopting digitalization reforms to improve public services, the justice domain is no exception. Although not as rapidly grown as the other e-government initiatives, electronic justice or e-justice practices are developed and implemented to make justice services and their administration more open, accessible, effective, efficient, and less expensive for all actors. On the other hand, there are also specific challenges or risks involved in the digitalization of this area, such as the delicacy of the processes, legal restrictions, ensuring the independence of the judiciary, system design, and good user experience, and high interoperability. As a result of the relatively immature nature and the diversity of e-justice systems being used around the world, an integrated research framework outlining the specific areas and topics of research for e-justice and identifying future research directions is still lacking. In light of this gap, this chapter systematically reviews scholarly research on e-justice to present an integrated research framework. We identify 36 key research publications related to e-justice employing Web of Science and Google Scholar and review them to highlight what we know and do not know about e-justice. The study reveals four broad areas of foci about e-justice research in general: Identification of success and risk factors, assessment of the impact of e-justice implementation, examination of e-justice user satisfaction and experiences, and evaluation of judicial websites. For each of the research areas outlined, theoretical foundations, specific research aims, and main findings, and suggested directions for future research are summarized. A future research agenda informed by the results of the review is proposed. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Administration and Information Technologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDigital justiceen_US
dc.subjectE-governmenten_US
dc.subjectE-justiceen_US
dc.subjectElectronic justiceen_US
dc.subjectEvaluation frameworken_US
dc.subjectICTen_US
dc.subjectJudiciaryen_US
dc.subjectResearch agendaen_US
dc.subjectSuccess factorsen_US
dc.subjectSystematic literature reviewen_US
dc.titleE-Justice: A Review and Agenda for Future Researchen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.startpage385en_US
dc.identifier.endpage414en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-92945-9_15-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.authorscopusid23968116100-
dc.authorscopusid55921339100-
dc.authorscopusid16481558600-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126459935en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeBook Part-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept08.02. Political Science and Public Administration-
Appears in Collections:İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Page view(s)

42
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.