Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47447
Title: Enhancement of heat transfer in shell and tube heat exchanger using mini-channels and nanofluids: An experimental study
Authors: Yılmaz M.S.
Ünverdi M.
Kücük H.
Akcakale N.
Halıcı F.
Keywords: Heat transfer enhancement
Mini-channel
Nanofluids
Shell and tube heat exchanger
Thermal and hydrodynamic performances
Alumina
Aluminum oxide
Flow of fluids
Friction
Heat convection
Heat exchangers
Hydrodynamics
Nanofluidics
Shells (structures)
Tubes (components)
Convective heat transfer
Heat transfer co-efficients
Heat Transfer enhancement
Hydrodynamics performance
Mini-channels
Nanofluids
Shell-and- tube heat exchangers
Thermal Performance
Transition regions
Water nanofluids
Heat transfer coefficients
Publisher: Elsevier Masson s.r.l.
Abstract: This study aimed to experimentally investigate the effects of Al2O3-water nanofluids with six different volume concentrations (0.02%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8%) instead of water as working fluid on heat transfer and pressure drop on the tube side of a mini-channel shell and tube heat exchanger (MC-STHE). The shell-side hot fluid flow rate was kept constant at 180 L/h, while the flow rate of the tube-side cold fluids ranged from 125 to 600 L/h. The convective heat transfer coefficient (CHTC) of the nanofluids increased in the transition and turbulent regions. The nanofluids also extended the transition region. The nanofluids had higher friction factors than water. The nanofluids had an optimal volumetric concentration and a flow rate of 0.4% and 375 L/h, respectively, at which the CHTC enhanced by 49%, while the friction factor increased by 21% compared to water. Compared to macrotube heat exchangers, the CHTC enhanced 3 to 7 times with the combined effect of the mini-channels and nanofluids in the shell-and-tube heat exchanger (STHE). Consistent with earlier studies (maximum TEF of 1.8), the thermal enhancement factor (TEF) for the optimal volumetric concentration Al2O3-water nanofluid in the MC-STHE was 1.6 at most under the same hydrodynamic conditions. The performance evaluation criterion (PEC) and the efficiency evaluation criterion (EEC) showed that there was no point (not enhancement) in using nanofluids instead of the base fluid (water) in the MC-STHE. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107664
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47447
ISSN: 1290-0729
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Sep 30, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Sep 30, 2024

Page view(s)

44
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.