Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47721
Title: Enzalutamide versus Abiraterone Acetate as first-line treatment of castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer in geriatric (? 75) patients
Authors: Alkan, Ali
Güç, Zeynep Gülsüm
Gürbüz, Mustafa
Özgün, Güliz
Değirmencioğlu, Serkan
Doğan, Mutlu
Akın Telli, Tuğba
Keskin, Özge
Arslan, Çağatay
Bilgin, Burak
Sezgin Göksu, Sema
Demir, Hacer
Köksoy, Elif Berna
Köstek, Osman
Ertürk, İsmail
Şakalar, Teoman
Yaşar, Arzu
Türkkan, Görkem
Kasım, Büşra
Karaoğlu, Aziz
Çakmak Öksüzoğlu, Berna
Yumuk, Fulden
Şendur, Mehmet Ali
Coşkun, Hasan Şenol
Çiçin, İrfan
Karadurmuş, Nuri
Tanrıverdi, Özgür
Akbulut, Hakan
Ürün, Yüksel
Keywords: Abiraterone Acetate
Elderly
Enzalutamide
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
abiraterone acetate
denosumab
enzalutamide
zoledronic acid
aged
Article
cancer prognosis
castration resistant prostate cancer
clinical evaluation
controlled study
drug dose reduction
drug efficacy
drug withdrawal
geriatric patient
Gleason score
human
hypertension
hypokalemia
major clinical study
malaise
male
multivariate analysis
overall survival
predictive value
proportional hazards model
retrospective study
side effect
very elderly
Publisher: The Dougmar Publishing Group
Abstract: Introduction: The efficacy and tolerability of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate have been reported in elderly patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is no randomized study directly comparing antitumor effects between these 2 agents in geriatric patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Enzalutamide (ENZA) and Abiraterone Acetate (AA) as a first-line treatment of mCRPC in elderly patients. Materials and methods: The geriatric patients (? 75 years of age) with a diagnosis of mCRPC and treated with first-line ENZA or AA were included. The impacts of clinical parameters and treatment modalities on overall survival (mOS) were analyzed retrospectively and Cox regression analysis was performed. Results: One hundred thirty-four mCRPC patients (77 in AA, 57 in ENZA), with a median age of 81 (75–93) were analyzed. The patient and disease characteristics were similar between arms. While there were more grade 1–2 toxicities in AA arm (45.5% vs 17.5%, P= 0.001), the discontinuation due to toxicity was similar between groups (8.5% vs 5.9%, P= 0.81). The mOS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 15.2–20.7) in AA, and 20.0 months (95% CI, 4.4–35.5) in ENZA arm (P= 0.47). In multivariate analysis, high Gleason score (? 8) (HR: 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1–3.4), P= 0.009) and high initial PSA values (? 100 ng/mL) (HR: 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5–4.8), P= 0.001) were poor prognostic factors. The choice of AA vs ENZA was insignificant as a predictor of OS (HR: 0.87 (95% CI, 0.48–1.56), P= 0.65). Conclusion: In the first-line treatment of mCRPC in elderly (? 75) patients, AA and ENZA showed similar results in terms of mPFS and mOS. The clinical impacts of second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in the elderly population should be tested in prospective randomized studies. © 2021. The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
URI: https://doi.org/10.31083/jomh.2021.041
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47721
ISSN: 1875-6867
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Jun 29, 2024

Page view(s)

44
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.