Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47721
Title: | Enzalutamide versus Abiraterone Acetate as first-line treatment of castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer in geriatric (? 75) patients | Authors: | Alkan, Ali Güç, Zeynep Gülsüm Gürbüz, Mustafa Özgün, Güliz Değirmencioğlu, Serkan Doğan, Mutlu Akın Telli, Tuğba Keskin, Özge Arslan, Çağatay Bilgin, Burak Sezgin Göksu, Sema Demir, Hacer Köksoy, Elif Berna Köstek, Osman Ertürk, İsmail Şakalar, Teoman Yaşar, Arzu Türkkan, Görkem Kasım, Büşra Karaoğlu, Aziz Çakmak Öksüzoğlu, Berna Yumuk, Fulden Şendur, Mehmet Ali Coşkun, Hasan Şenol Çiçin, İrfan Karadurmuş, Nuri Tanrıverdi, Özgür Akbulut, Hakan Ürün, Yüksel |
Keywords: | Abiraterone Acetate Elderly Enzalutamide Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer abiraterone acetate denosumab enzalutamide zoledronic acid aged Article cancer prognosis castration resistant prostate cancer clinical evaluation controlled study drug dose reduction drug efficacy drug withdrawal geriatric patient Gleason score human hypertension hypokalemia major clinical study malaise male multivariate analysis overall survival predictive value proportional hazards model retrospective study side effect very elderly |
Publisher: | The Dougmar Publishing Group | Abstract: | Introduction: The efficacy and tolerability of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate have been reported in elderly patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is no randomized study directly comparing antitumor effects between these 2 agents in geriatric patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Enzalutamide (ENZA) and Abiraterone Acetate (AA) as a first-line treatment of mCRPC in elderly patients. Materials and methods: The geriatric patients (? 75 years of age) with a diagnosis of mCRPC and treated with first-line ENZA or AA were included. The impacts of clinical parameters and treatment modalities on overall survival (mOS) were analyzed retrospectively and Cox regression analysis was performed. Results: One hundred thirty-four mCRPC patients (77 in AA, 57 in ENZA), with a median age of 81 (75–93) were analyzed. The patient and disease characteristics were similar between arms. While there were more grade 1–2 toxicities in AA arm (45.5% vs 17.5%, P= 0.001), the discontinuation due to toxicity was similar between groups (8.5% vs 5.9%, P= 0.81). The mOS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 15.2–20.7) in AA, and 20.0 months (95% CI, 4.4–35.5) in ENZA arm (P= 0.47). In multivariate analysis, high Gleason score (? 8) (HR: 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1–3.4), P= 0.009) and high initial PSA values (? 100 ng/mL) (HR: 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5–4.8), P= 0.001) were poor prognostic factors. The choice of AA vs ENZA was insignificant as a predictor of OS (HR: 0.87 (95% CI, 0.48–1.56), P= 0.65). Conclusion: In the first-line treatment of mCRPC in elderly (? 75) patients, AA and ENZA showed similar results in terms of mPFS and mOS. The clinical impacts of second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in the elderly population should be tested in prospective randomized studies. © 2021. The Author(s). Published by IMR Press. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.31083/jomh.2021.041 https://hdl.handle.net/11499/47721 |
ISSN: | 1875-6867 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on Dec 14, 2024
Page view(s)
60
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.