Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4849
Title: Can Cystatin C be a better marker for the early detection of renal damage in primary hypertensive patients?
Authors: Ozer, B.A.
Baykal, A.
Dursun, Belda.
Gultekin, M.
Suleymanlar, G.
Keywords: Cystatin C
GFR
MDRD
Primary hypertension
albumin
beta 2 microglobulin
biochemical marker
creatinine
cystatin C
nitrogen
protein
urea
uric acid
adult
albumin blood level
area under the curve
article
calculation
comparative study
controlled study
correlation analysis
creatinine blood level
creatinine clearance
diagnostic value
early diagnosis
female
glomerulus filtration rate
human
hypertension
kidney injury
major clinical study
male
priority journal
protein urine level
reference value
statistical significance
urea nitrogen blood level
uric acid blood level
Adult
beta 2-Microglobulin
Biological Markers
Blood Urea Nitrogen
Creatinine
Cystatins
Disease Progression
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Hypertension
Kidney Diseases
Male
Middle Aged
ROC Curve
Severity of Illness Index
Uric Acid
Abstract: In this study, we aimed to compare Cystatin C (Cys C) with other traditional glomerular filtration rate (GFR) markers and to evaluate its superiority over them in detecting early renal involvement in patients with primary hypertension. Fifty-one primary hypertensive patients and 29 healthy control subjects, who were similar in terms of age and gender, were included in the study. In all subjects serum levels of Cys C, beta-2 microglobulin, serum creatinine (SCr), uric acid, BUN, albumin; 24 h urinary levels of protein (Upro), albumin (Ualb) and creatinine were measured. The GFR was calculated according to Creatinine Clearance (CrCl), Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas. The MDRD was used as the reference method. A GFR<80 mL/min/1.73 m2 was considered as the lower cut-off limit. Mean levels of the serum parameters were found to be significantly higher in the patient group than they were in the control group (p<0.05). Mean CrCl, CG, and MDRD levels were lower in patients than they were in controls but the difference was statistically significant for CG and MDRD. The serum parameter having the best correlation with MDRD was SCr (r=-0.760) in patients and Cys C (r=-0.622) in controls. However, in ROC analysis; the area under curve (AUC) for Cys C was found to be superior (AUC=0.900) to the other markers. The CrCl was the parameter having the worst diagnostic efficiency (AUC=0.598). As a conclusion, compared to other traditional markers, measurement of Cys C may be a better parameter to estimate GFR, especially to detect mild reductions of GFR in primary hypertensive patients. Copyright © 2005 Taylor & Francis Inc.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/4849
https://doi.org/10.1081/JDI-200056635
ISSN: 0886-022X
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Jun 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
checked on Jun 14, 2024

Page view(s)

36
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.