Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5023
Title: | Presence and HRCT quantification of bronchiectasis in coal workers | Authors: | Altin, R. Savranlar, A. Kart, L. Mahmutyazicioglu, K. Ozdemir, H. Akdag, B. Gundogdu, S. |
Keywords: | Bronchiectasis Coal worker's pneumoconiosis HRCT Coal dust Computerized tomography Health care Personnel Radiation effects Regression analysis X rays Asthma Coal workers Tuberculosis Pulmonary diseases coal adult article asthma bronchiectasis bronchodilatation chronic obstructive lung disease classification coal worker confidence interval controlled study disease severity evaluation exposure high resolution computer tomography human logistic regression analysis lung fibrosis major clinical study patient pneumoconiosis priority journal quantitative analysis retrospective study risk assessment risk factor statistical significance thickness thorax radiography tuberculosis X ray analysis Adult Coal Mining Humans Male Middle Aged Occupational Diseases Retrospective Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
Abstract: | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of bronchiectasis in coal workers with or without coal worker pneumoconiosis (CWP) and to assess the extent of bronchiectasis, severity of bronchial wall dilatation and thickening by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Materials and methods: The retrospective study consisted of HRCT archieves of 93 coal workers. The coal workers with previous diagnosis of COPD (six), asthma (one) and tuberculosis (three) were excluded. Five coal workers with progressive massive fibrosis were not included into the study. The resulting patient group consisted of 78 patients (43 CWP; 35 non-CWP). Pneumoconiosis profusions of CWP workers were between p0/1 and p2/2 according to ILO 1980 chest X-ray classification. HRCT examinations of all subjects were evaluated for the presence, extent, dilatation and thickness of bronchiectasis. Analysis of extent, dilatation and thickness were performed according to established criteria. Results: The diagnosis of bronchiectasis was put on 19 of 43 CWP (44.1%) and 7 of 35 non-CWP workers (20.0%). There were statistically significant differences between bronchiectasis positive and negative coal workers with CWP concerning age and exposure duration (P = 0.012 and 0.009, respectively). Then, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to define exact risk factors. Exposure duration was only found to be related with presence of bronchiectasis [(odds ratio) OR = 1.494, 95% confidence interval 1.168-1.912]. Conclusions: The data from the present study shows that bronchiectasis is frequent and severe in CWP workers than without. Bronchiectasis is influenced by coal dust exposure. Thus, coal dust protection measures must be controlled efficiently to prevent bronchiectasis in coal workers. © 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.017 |
ISSN: | 0720-048X |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
12
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
10
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Page view(s)
38
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.