Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5023
Title: Presence and HRCT quantification of bronchiectasis in coal workers
Authors: Altin, R.
Savranlar, A.
Kart, L.
Mahmutyazicioglu, K.
Ozdemir, H.
Akdag, B.
Gundogdu, S.
Keywords: Bronchiectasis
Coal worker's pneumoconiosis
HRCT
Coal dust
Computerized tomography
Health care
Personnel
Radiation effects
Regression analysis
X rays
Asthma
Coal workers
Tuberculosis
Pulmonary diseases
coal
adult
article
asthma
bronchiectasis
bronchodilatation
chronic obstructive lung disease
classification
coal worker
confidence interval
controlled study
disease severity
evaluation
exposure
high resolution computer tomography
human
logistic regression analysis
lung fibrosis
major clinical study
patient
pneumoconiosis
priority journal
quantitative analysis
retrospective study
risk assessment
risk factor
statistical significance
thickness
thorax radiography
tuberculosis
X ray analysis
Adult
Coal Mining
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Diseases
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of bronchiectasis in coal workers with or without coal worker pneumoconiosis (CWP) and to assess the extent of bronchiectasis, severity of bronchial wall dilatation and thickening by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Materials and methods: The retrospective study consisted of HRCT archieves of 93 coal workers. The coal workers with previous diagnosis of COPD (six), asthma (one) and tuberculosis (three) were excluded. Five coal workers with progressive massive fibrosis were not included into the study. The resulting patient group consisted of 78 patients (43 CWP; 35 non-CWP). Pneumoconiosis profusions of CWP workers were between p0/1 and p2/2 according to ILO 1980 chest X-ray classification. HRCT examinations of all subjects were evaluated for the presence, extent, dilatation and thickness of bronchiectasis. Analysis of extent, dilatation and thickness were performed according to established criteria. Results: The diagnosis of bronchiectasis was put on 19 of 43 CWP (44.1%) and 7 of 35 non-CWP workers (20.0%). There were statistically significant differences between bronchiectasis positive and negative coal workers with CWP concerning age and exposure duration (P = 0.012 and 0.009, respectively). Then, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to define exact risk factors. Exposure duration was only found to be related with presence of bronchiectasis [(odds ratio) OR = 1.494, 95% confidence interval 1.168-1.912]. Conclusions: The data from the present study shows that bronchiectasis is frequent and severe in CWP workers than without. Bronchiectasis is influenced by coal dust exposure. Thus, coal dust protection measures must be controlled efficiently to prevent bronchiectasis in coal workers. © 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.017
ISSN: 0720-048X
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on Jul 10, 2024

Page view(s)

12
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.