Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/50625
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorToprak, E.-
dc.contributor.authorKalkan, Ö.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-08T10:04:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-08T10:04:57Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn0034-8082-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2023-399-568-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/50625-
dc.description.abstractStudies aiming to determine the importance rankings of one or more predictor variables on the predicted variable are frequently encountered in education. Multiple Regression (MR) and artificial neural network (ANN) are widely used in this type of research. The preŞent study compares the predictive importance rank performances of MR and ANN methods. For this purpose, two separate real data sets, in which MR assumptions are met and the predictor variables are continuous or discrete, and simulation data generated by considering the relationships in these data sets were used. Absolute relative bias (ARB) and mean square errors (MSE) were used to compare the methods’ performances. The results of the research showed that the increase in sample size had an improving effect on the ARBs and MSEs of the methods. In addition, if the predictors are continuous, researchers may be advised to choose either MR or ANN. However, in cases where the predictors are discrete and the number of predictors is three or more, the use of ANN is recommended. In order to obtain optimal estimations with both methods, it is recommended that researchers use a sample size of at least 200. © 2023, Ministry Education and Science. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMinistry Education and Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Educacionen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectartificial neural networksen_US
dc.subjectcontinuous predictoren_US
dc.subjectdiscrete predictoren_US
dc.subjectmultiple regression analysisen_US
dc.subjectorder of importanceen_US
dc.subjectpredictive correlational researchen_US
dc.titleComparison of multiple regression and artificial neural network performances in determining the order of importance of predictors in educational researchen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparación del rendimiento de la regresión múltiple y la red neuronal artificial en la determinación del orden de importancia de los predictores en la investigación educativaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume2023en_US
dc.identifier.issue399en_US
dc.identifier.startpage221en_US
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2023-399-568-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid58019572000-
dc.authorscopusid57163498300-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146382368en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001061971000010en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept09.05. Educational Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

42
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.