Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5203
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYaylalı, Volkan-
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Cem-
dc.contributor.authorTatlıpınar, Sinan-
dc.contributor.authorDemirlenk, İbrahim-
dc.contributor.authorArık, Sevda-
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, Serap-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T11:42:57Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T11:42:57Z
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.issn0030-3755-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/5203-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000073071-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the subjective visual experiences and pain during the phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation under topical anesthesia, and whether these parameters change according to the stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Methods: Forty eyes of 40 patients with cataract undergoing phacoemulsification and IOL implantation under topical anesthesia were included in this study. The patients were told that they would be asked about their visual experiences and pain level, if any, during every stage of the surgery. As for degree of the pain, a 5-grade scale was used. The surgery was divided into 9 stages, i.e., clear corneal incision, continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, side-port incisions at 3 and 9 o'clock positions, hydrodissection, nuclear rotation, phacoemulsification, bimanual irrigation and aspiration, IOL implantation, apposition of corneal incisions with stromal hydration. Results: All subjects (100%) reported that they had seen some kind of light during the operation. Thirty-eight patients (95%) said that they had seen one or more colors. In 32 patients (80%), the light intensity decreased, and colors blurred significantly following the hydrodissection. As for the pain level during surgery, the overall pain score was found to be 0.40. The highest mean pain score was noted during IOL implantation stage followed by phacoemulsification and bimanual irrigation-aspiration. Conclusion: Topical anesthesia is both a safe and effective method for small-incision clear corneal phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Patients may experience visual sensations, and the pain felt during the operation is low and tolerable. Visual experiences and pain level may change according to the stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Copyright © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmologicaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCataract surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectPhacoemulsificationen_US
dc.subjectTopical anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectVisual experienceen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectaspirationen_US
dc.subjectcapsulorhexisen_US
dc.subjectcataracten_US
dc.subjectcataract extractionen_US
dc.subjectclinical articleen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectcorneaen_US
dc.subjectdissectionen_US
dc.subjectexperienceen_US
dc.subjecteye coloren_US
dc.subjecteye painen_US
dc.subjecteye surgeryen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectlens implanten_US
dc.subjectlens implantationen_US
dc.subjectlighten_US
dc.subjectlight intensityen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectpain thresholden_US
dc.subjectphacoemulsificationen_US
dc.subjectscale upen_US
dc.subjectscoring systemen_US
dc.subjectsurgical techniqueen_US
dc.subjecttopical anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectvisionen_US
dc.subjectvisual impairmenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Localen_US
dc.subjectAnesthetics, Localen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLens Implantation, Intraocularen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPain Measurementen_US
dc.subjectPerceptual Disordersen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectSensation Disordersen_US
dc.subjectVisual Acuityen_US
dc.titleSubjective visual experience and pain level during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation under topical anesthesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume217en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage413
dc.identifier.startpage413en_US
dc.identifier.endpage416en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000073071-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid14573974en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0142165836en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000186459700006en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale_University-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Nov 23, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

23
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Page view(s)

50
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.