Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/52104
Title: The Turkish Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Society (KLİMİK) Evidence-Based Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brucellosis, 2023
Other Titles: Türk Klinik Mikrobiyoloji ve İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları Derneği Kanıta Dayalı Bruselloz Tanı ve Tedavi Klinik Uygulama Rehberi, 2023
Authors: Şimşek-Yavuz, S.
Özger, S.
Benli, A.
Ateş, C.
Aydın, M.
Aygün, G.
Azap, A.
Başaran, Seniha
Demirtürk, Neşe
Kocagül Çelikbaş, Aysel
Kuşçu, Ferit
Sarıcaoğlu, Elif Mukime
Sayın Kutlu, Selda
Türker, Nesrin
Türkoğlu Yılmaz, Emine
Keywords: Brucella
Brucellosis
diagnosis
treatment
Article
Brucella
brucellosis
evidence based practice
human
meta analysis
nonhuman
outcome assessment
physician
practice guideline
scientific literature
Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Publisher: DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.
Abstract: Although brucellosis is very common in the world and Türkiye, there are no evidence-based guidelines to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. This guide has been prepared by the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to provide evidence-based recommendations to physicians from different specialties interested in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis. The recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide Development Guide of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were taken as the basis for preparing this guide. The guideline preparation group determined 20 questions considered to be important in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis, and the publications that could answer these questions prepared in PICO (Population/Patient [P], Intervention [I], Comparison [C], Outcome [O]) format, were searched in ULAKBİM Tr Dizin, PubMed, Cochrane databases without date restrictions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to rank the evidence and determine the strength of the recommendations for each PICO question and for each individual outcome. Meta-analyses of comparative clinical studies were performed to answer the PICO questions. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses with data obtained from case reports and case series were conducted in the absence of comparative clinical studies. It is planned to update the recommendations at regular intervals in line with the results of new studies. © 2023, DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.. All rights reserved.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/52104
https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2023.4576
https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1183202
ISSN: 1301-143X
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
document (2).pdf2.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 23, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Page view(s)

262
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

114
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.