Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/52104
Title: | The Turkish Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Society (KLİMİK) Evidence-Based Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brucellosis, 2023 | Other Titles: | Türk Klinik Mikrobiyoloji ve İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları Derneği Kanıta Dayalı Bruselloz Tanı ve Tedavi Klinik Uygulama Rehberi, 2023 | Authors: | Şimşek-Yavuz, S. Özger, S. Benli, A. Ateş, C. Aydın, M. Aygün, G. Azap, A. Başaran, Seniha Demirtürk, Neşe Kocagül Çelikbaş, Aysel Kuşçu, Ferit Sarıcaoğlu, Elif Mukime Sayın Kutlu, Selda Türker, Nesrin Türkoğlu Yılmaz, Emine |
Keywords: | Brucella Brucellosis diagnosis treatment Article Brucella brucellosis evidence based practice human meta analysis nonhuman outcome assessment physician practice guideline scientific literature Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases |
Publisher: | DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd. | Abstract: | Although brucellosis is very common in the world and Türkiye, there are no evidence-based guidelines to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. This guide has been prepared by the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to provide evidence-based recommendations to physicians from different specialties interested in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis. The recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide Development Guide of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were taken as the basis for preparing this guide. The guideline preparation group determined 20 questions considered to be important in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis, and the publications that could answer these questions prepared in PICO (Population/Patient [P], Intervention [I], Comparison [C], Outcome [O]) format, were searched in ULAKBİM Tr Dizin, PubMed, Cochrane databases without date restrictions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to rank the evidence and determine the strength of the recommendations for each PICO question and for each individual outcome. Meta-analyses of comparative clinical studies were performed to answer the PICO questions. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses with data obtained from case reports and case series were conducted in the absence of comparative clinical studies. It is planned to update the recommendations at regular intervals in line with the results of new studies. © 2023, DOC Design and Informatics Co. Ltd.. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/52104 https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2023.4576 https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1183202 |
ISSN: | 1301-143X |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
document (2).pdf | 2.9 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Nov 23, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
6
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Page view(s)
262
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
114
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.