Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5255
Title: | Montelukast as an adjuvant to mainstay therapies in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis | Authors: | Topuz, Bülent Ögmen, G.G. |
Keywords: | Efficacy Leukotriene receptor antagonist Loratidine Mometasone furoate Montelukast Rhinoconjunctivitis antihistaminic agent corticosteroid leukotriene receptor blocking agent loratadine mometasone furoate montelukast adjuvant therapy adolescent adult aged allergic rhinitis article clinical feature clinical trial controlled clinical trial controlled study drowsiness drug efficacy drug safety epistaxis female headache human increased appetite irritability maintenance therapy major clinical study male nasal pruritus nose congestion nose disease nose irritation patient satisfaction phase 1 clinical trial phase 2 clinical trial phase 3 clinical trial physician attitude priority journal seasonal variation side effect sneezing xerostomia Acetates Adjuvants, Immunologic Adolescent Adrenergic beta-Antagonists Adult Aged Drug Therapy, Combination Female Histamine H1 Antagonists Humans Leukotriene Antagonists Loratadine Male Middle Aged Patient Satisfaction Pregnadienediols Prospective Studies Quinolines Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal |
Abstract: | Background: Drug selection for optimal treatment of allergic rhinitis may be difficult and involve many diverse factors. Objective: To evaluate montelukast, in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, as an adjuvant to mainstay therapies, i.e., antihistamines and corticosteroids. Methods: The study was a prospective, three-phased (per lasted 2 weeks) clinical trial. In phase I, patients were separated into two groups, based on the predominating symptoms: (1) runners (patients with moderate to severe sneezing/itchy, watery nose/itchy, watery eyes), and (2) blockers (patients with moderate to severe nasal congestion). The runners received antihistamine loratidine 10mg daily, and the blockers received intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate 200 µg. In phase II, if patients were dissatisfied with the initial treatment, they were assigned to receive another study drug additionally. In phase III, for the patients unsatisfied with the treatment of loratidine plus mometasone furoate, montelukast 10 mg once daily was added. Results: Of the 169 patients who entered phase I, 150 could be evaluated for treatment efficacy and safety. There were 108 runners and 42 blockers. Physicians' and patients' assessments indicated that in phase I 58 runners (60.0% of 50 runners) and 36 blockers (33.3% of six blockers) were satisfied with their therapy. In phase II, 30 runners (27.7%) and two blockers (4.7%) were satisfied with the addition of other study drug. Totally 62.6% of patients were satisfied at the end of phase I, and 84.0% at the end of phase II. Sixteen patients (66.6% of 24 patients) were satisfied with the addition of montelukast to the previous two drugs (in total, 10.6% of patients). Fourteen patients (12.2%) treated with loratadine, and three patients (0.3%) treated with mometasone, reported side-effect. Conclusion: The results of this trial indicate that 10% of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis may be treated with the supplement of montelukast to mainstay therapy. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5255 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01690.x |
ISSN: | 0954-7894 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
19
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
36
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.