Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5255
Title: Montelukast as an adjuvant to mainstay therapies in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis
Authors: Topuz, Bülent
Ögmen, G.G.
Keywords: Efficacy
Leukotriene receptor antagonist
Loratidine
Mometasone furoate
Montelukast
Rhinoconjunctivitis
antihistaminic agent
corticosteroid
leukotriene receptor blocking agent
loratadine
mometasone furoate
montelukast
adjuvant therapy
adolescent
adult
aged
allergic rhinitis
article
clinical feature
clinical trial
controlled clinical trial
controlled study
drowsiness
drug efficacy
drug safety
epistaxis
female
headache
human
increased appetite
irritability
maintenance therapy
major clinical study
male
nasal pruritus
nose congestion
nose disease
nose irritation
patient satisfaction
phase 1 clinical trial
phase 2 clinical trial
phase 3 clinical trial
physician attitude
priority journal
seasonal variation
side effect
sneezing
xerostomia
Acetates
Adjuvants, Immunologic
Adolescent
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
Adult
Aged
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Histamine H1 Antagonists
Humans
Leukotriene Antagonists
Loratadine
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Pregnadienediols
Prospective Studies
Quinolines
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
Abstract: Background: Drug selection for optimal treatment of allergic rhinitis may be difficult and involve many diverse factors. Objective: To evaluate montelukast, in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, as an adjuvant to mainstay therapies, i.e., antihistamines and corticosteroids. Methods: The study was a prospective, three-phased (per lasted 2 weeks) clinical trial. In phase I, patients were separated into two groups, based on the predominating symptoms: (1) runners (patients with moderate to severe sneezing/itchy, watery nose/itchy, watery eyes), and (2) blockers (patients with moderate to severe nasal congestion). The runners received antihistamine loratidine 10mg daily, and the blockers received intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate 200 µg. In phase II, if patients were dissatisfied with the initial treatment, they were assigned to receive another study drug additionally. In phase III, for the patients unsatisfied with the treatment of loratidine plus mometasone furoate, montelukast 10 mg once daily was added. Results: Of the 169 patients who entered phase I, 150 could be evaluated for treatment efficacy and safety. There were 108 runners and 42 blockers. Physicians' and patients' assessments indicated that in phase I 58 runners (60.0% of 50 runners) and 36 blockers (33.3% of six blockers) were satisfied with their therapy. In phase II, 30 runners (27.7%) and two blockers (4.7%) were satisfied with the addition of other study drug. Totally 62.6% of patients were satisfied at the end of phase I, and 84.0% at the end of phase II. Sixteen patients (66.6% of 24 patients) were satisfied with the addition of montelukast to the previous two drugs (in total, 10.6% of patients). Fourteen patients (12.2%) treated with loratadine, and three patients (0.3%) treated with mometasone, reported side-effect. Conclusion: The results of this trial indicate that 10% of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis may be treated with the supplement of montelukast to mainstay therapy.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5255
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01690.x
ISSN: 0954-7894
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
checked on Jul 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
checked on Jul 31, 2024

Page view(s)

34
checked on Jul 31, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.