Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/54810
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOskay, Alten-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-18T09:29:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-18T09:29:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1309-9833-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1353037-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1201856-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/54810-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Interpretation of thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans by emergency department (ED) physicians is important especially in crowded EDs. The aim of this study is to assess the proficiency and confidence of ED physicians with varying levels of experience in interpreting thoracic CT. Materials and methods: A total of 25 pathological and 5 normal thoracic CT images were interpreted by 32 ED residents, initially without clinical information, then with. After each session the participants were asked to score their confidence on a scale of 1 to 10. At the end of the study, the results were compared between seniors and junior residents. Results: The median age of the participants was 29 years (24-34). Twenty (62.5%) of the residents were junior residents. There were no significant differences between the two resident groups in terms of accurate diagnosis rates, regardless of the clinical information (p=0.307 and p=0.061). The physicians’ certainty of their own diagnosis mostly does not seem to be statistically different in these diagnoses. The seniors are more confident in the diagnosis of the CT scans they evaluated without clinical information (p=0.004), while when the clinical information is added, the confidence of the junior physicians also increase (p=0.087). Conclusion: Both senior and junior emergency medical residents are able to interpret thoracic CT images with a high degree of accuracy, both for COVID-19 and for other emergency diagnoses. Senior physicians were confident in their decisions regardless of whether they are accurate or not, solely by visual inspection, whereas junior residents displayed similar confidence when clinical information was available. © 2023, Pamukkale University. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPamukkale Medical Journalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectClinical informationen_US
dc.subjectconfidenceen_US
dc.subjectemergency medicineen_US
dc.subjectresidentsen_US
dc.subjectthoracic computed tomographyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of thoracic computed tomography interpretation by emergency medicine residents with regards to accuracy and confidenceen_US
dc.title.alternativeAcil tıp araştırma görevlilerinin, toraks bilgisayarlı tomografisi yorumlamada doğruluk ve özgüven açısından değerlendirilmesien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage698en_US
dc.identifier.endpage703en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31362/patd.1353037-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid36465431900-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85173953684en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1201856en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

38
checked on May 27, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.