Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/54966
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSipahi, Oğuz Reşat-
dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Deniz-
dc.contributor.authorÖrmen, Bahar-
dc.contributor.authorÇicek Şentürk, Gönül-
dc.contributor.authorMermer, Sinan-
dc.contributor.authorÖnal, Uğur-
dc.contributor.authorAmer, Fatma-
dc.contributor.authorSaed, Maysaa Abdallah-
dc.contributor.authorTükenmez Tigen, Elif-
dc.contributor.authorÖztoprak, Nefise-
dc.contributor.authorAltın, Ümmugülsüm-
dc.contributor.authorKurtaran, Behice-
dc.contributor.authorPopescu, Corneliu Petru-
dc.contributor.authorSakci, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorSuntur, Bedia Mutay-
dc.contributor.authorGautam, Vikas-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Megha-
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Şafak-
dc.contributor.authorAkçıl, Eren Fatma-
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Selçuk-
dc.contributor.authorTurunç, Tuba-
dc.contributor.authorErgen, Pınar-
dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Özlem-
dc.contributor.authorCesur, Salih-
dc.contributor.authorBardak Özcem, Selin-
dc.contributor.authorÖzgiray, Erkin-
dc.contributor.authorYurtseven, Taşkın-
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Hüseyin Aytaç-
dc.contributor.authorSipahi, Hilal-
dc.contributor.authorArda, Bilgin-
dc.contributor.authorPullukcu, Huesnue-
dc.contributor.authorTaşbakan, Meltem-
dc.contributor.authorYamazhan, Tansu-
dc.contributor.authorAydemir, Söhret-
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Sercan-
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Kevser-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-18T09:57:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-18T09:57:44Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08596-z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/54966-
dc.description.abstractBackground Herein, we analyzed the efficacy of main antibiotic therapy regimens in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis (HCAM).Materials/methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 18 tertiary-care academic hospitals Turkey, India, Egypt and Romania. We extracted data and outcomes of all patients with post-neurosurgical meningitis cases fulfilling the study inclusion criteria and treated with empirical therapy between December 2006-September 2018.Results Twenty patients in the cefepime + vancomycin-(CV) group, 31 patients in the ceftazidime + vancomycin-(CFV) group, and 119 patients in the meropenem + vancomycin-(MV) group met the inclusion criteria. The MV subgroup had a significantly higher mean Glasgow Coma Score, a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit within the previous month, and a higher rate of antibiot herapy within the previous month before the meningitis episode (p < 0.05). Microbiological success on Day 3-5, end of treatment (EOT) clinical success (80% vs. 54.8%% vs 57.9%), and overall success (EOT success followed by one-month survival without relapse or reinfection 65% vs. 51.6% vs. 45.3%), EOT all cause mortality (ACM) and day 30 ACM (15% vs. 22.6% vs. 26%) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) among the three cohorts. No regimen was effective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria, and vancomycin resulted in an EOT clinical success rate of 60.6% in the methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci subgroup (n = 34).Conclusions Our study showed no significant difference in terms of clinical success and mortality among the three treatment options. All regimens were ineffective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Vancomycin was unsuccessful in approximately 40% of cases involving methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBmcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare-associated meningitisen_US
dc.subjectEmpirical therapyen_US
dc.subjectMulticenter studyen_US
dc.subjectGlycopeptidesen_US
dc.subjectAntibioticsen_US
dc.subjectNosocomial Bacterial-Meningitisen_US
dc.subjectResistant Staphylococcus-Aureusen_US
dc.subjectPractice Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectClinical-Featuresen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectAdultsen_US
dc.subjectVentriculitisen_US
dc.subjectSeriesen_US
dc.titleEmpirical cefepime plus vancomycin versus ceftazidime plus vancomycin versus meropenem plus vancomycin in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis: results of the multicenter ephesus studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12879-023-08596-z-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid10340240700-
dc.authorscopusid57199151189-
dc.authorscopusid8413935700-
dc.authorscopusid6504126867-
dc.authorscopusid56039759700-
dc.authorscopusid57204010130-
dc.authorscopusid56556435400-
dc.identifier.pmid37770836en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85172827939en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001078643300003en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
EBSCO-FullText-2024-01-31 (1).pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

154
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

38
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.