Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/5633
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBostancı, Erdal Birol-
dc.contributor.authorTetik, C.-
dc.contributor.authorÖzer, Ş.-
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, A.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T11:51:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T11:51:00Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.issn0001-5458-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/5633-
dc.description.abstractLaparoscopic herniorraphies have been used to reduce the pain and convalescence associated with open approaches. However, there is still not any consensus of the best approach. We compared open preperitoneal and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal approaches in groin hernia repair. Methods. Thirty-two patients underwent open preperitoneal herniorraphy (Group I) and other 32 patients underwent total extraperitoneal repair (Group II). Time of surgery was noted. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was applied to evaluate the postoperative pain intensity. Results. Operation time was 35 (20-65) minutes in Group I and 58 (40-85) minutes in Group II (p < 0.05). The difference of complication ratios between two groups was not significant. Laparoscopic approach was associated with less pain within postoperative 24 hours as compared to the open technique. However, after the first postoperative day, there was no longer statistically significant difference between both groups. No recurrence has yet been seen in follow-up period of 15 (4-24) months. Conclusion. Laparoscopic herniorraphy is associated with better results in term of postoperative pain within the first 24 hours as compared to open technique.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Chirurgica Belgicaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic herniorraphyen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative painen_US
dc.subjectVisual analogue scaleen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectageden_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectclinical trialen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trialen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectinguinal herniaen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmethodologyen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectpostoperative painen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHernia, Inguinalen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPain, Postoperativeen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operativeen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titlePosterior approaches in groin hernia repair with prosthesis : Open or Closeden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage241-
dc.identifier.startpage241en_US
dc.identifier.endpage244en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0032254507en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000077850000002en_US
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

40
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.