Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/56520
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorToprak, İ.-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Ç.-
dc.contributor.authorGüneş, C.E.-
dc.contributor.authorAlio, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T14:31:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-30T14:31:10Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2149-8709-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.68188-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/56520-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To retest the performance of Pentacam parameters in the detection of eyes with subclinical keratoconus (KC) and mild KC based on different definitions from the Amsler-Krumeich (AK), Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK), and ABCD systems. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional university-based study comprised 24 eyes with subclinical KC, 144 eyes with mild KC (based on AK in 101 eyes, CLEK in 28 eyes, and ABCD in 15 eyes), and 70 controls. Diagnostic ability of the thinnest point (TP) pachymetry, KISA% index, inferior-superior asymmetry, corneal aberrations, Pentacam indices, front/ back elevations, pachymetric progression index, Ambrósio-Relational Thickness (ARTmax), and Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display scores (Df, Db, Dp, Dt, Da, and D-final) were evaluated. Results: ARTmax (83.3% sensitivity/74.3% specificity) had the highest ability in distinguishing subclinical KC from normal, followed by TP pachymetry, Dt, and Da. D-final showed excellent sensitivity/specificity in mild KC diagnosis based on AK (98%/100%) and CLEK (97.4%/100%) descriptions. In the mild KC-ABCD group, index of vertical asymmetry accurately detected all eyes with mild KC and 97.1% of the controls. Conclusion: This study points out the gray zone in the detection of eyes with subclinical and mild KC due to overlapping terminology and grading criteria. Pentacam parameters seem to have modest capability in subclinical KC detection, indicating the necessity for additional diagnostic modalities. However, eyes with mild KC can be diagnosed with high accuracy using Pentacam parameters, although the strongest parameters may vary according to the definition of “mild KC.” Nevertheless, uniform and definitive criteria for subclinical and clinical KC classification are required for a diagnostic and therapeutic consensus in KC. © 2023 by the Turkish Ophthalmological Association/Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology published by Galenos Publishing House.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRD16/0008/0012; European Regional Development Fund, ERDFen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Ophthalmology Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectPentacamen_US
dc.subjectScheimpflugen_US
dc.subjectsubclinical keratoconusen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectastigmatismen_US
dc.subjectbest corrected visual acuityen_US
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectcell densityen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectcorneal thicknessen_US
dc.subjectcross-sectional studyen_US
dc.subjecteye movementen_US
dc.subjectgray matteren_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectkeratoconusen_US
dc.subjectkeratometryen_US
dc.subjectmild keratoconusen_US
dc.subjectoptical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.subjectpachymetryen_US
dc.subjectphacoemulsificationen_US
dc.subjectphenotypeen_US
dc.subjectprospective studyen_US
dc.subjectreceiver operating characteristicen_US
dc.subjectrefraction erroren_US
dc.subjectretrospective studyen_US
dc.subjectscoring systemen_US
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subjectslit lamp microscopyen_US
dc.subjectspine fusionen_US
dc.subjectsubclinical keratoconusen_US
dc.subjecttopographyen_US
dc.subjectvisual acuityen_US
dc.subjectvisual fielden_US
dc.subjectcorneal pachymetryen_US
dc.subjectCorneal Pachymetryen_US
dc.subjectCorneal Topographyen_US
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectKeratoconusen_US
dc.subjectROC Curveen_US
dc.titleRevisiting Pentacam Parameters in the Diagnosis of Subclinical and Mild Keratoconus Based on Different Grading System Definitionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage324en_US
dc.identifier.endpage335en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.68188-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid55298699700-
dc.authorscopusid57210854684-
dc.authorscopusid57517522000-
dc.authorscopusid55976898900-
dc.identifier.pmid38008938en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180541878en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001133160800005en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
TJO-53-324-En.pdf4.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Page view(s)

82
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.