Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/56520
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Toprak, İ. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Ç. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Güneş, C.E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alio, J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-30T14:31:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-30T14:31:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2149-8709 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.68188 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/56520 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To retest the performance of Pentacam parameters in the detection of eyes with subclinical keratoconus (KC) and mild KC based on different definitions from the Amsler-Krumeich (AK), Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK), and ABCD systems. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional university-based study comprised 24 eyes with subclinical KC, 144 eyes with mild KC (based on AK in 101 eyes, CLEK in 28 eyes, and ABCD in 15 eyes), and 70 controls. Diagnostic ability of the thinnest point (TP) pachymetry, KISA% index, inferior-superior asymmetry, corneal aberrations, Pentacam indices, front/ back elevations, pachymetric progression index, Ambrósio-Relational Thickness (ARTmax), and Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display scores (Df, Db, Dp, Dt, Da, and D-final) were evaluated. Results: ARTmax (83.3% sensitivity/74.3% specificity) had the highest ability in distinguishing subclinical KC from normal, followed by TP pachymetry, Dt, and Da. D-final showed excellent sensitivity/specificity in mild KC diagnosis based on AK (98%/100%) and CLEK (97.4%/100%) descriptions. In the mild KC-ABCD group, index of vertical asymmetry accurately detected all eyes with mild KC and 97.1% of the controls. Conclusion: This study points out the gray zone in the detection of eyes with subclinical and mild KC due to overlapping terminology and grading criteria. Pentacam parameters seem to have modest capability in subclinical KC detection, indicating the necessity for additional diagnostic modalities. However, eyes with mild KC can be diagnosed with high accuracy using Pentacam parameters, although the strongest parameters may vary according to the definition of “mild KC.” Nevertheless, uniform and definitive criteria for subclinical and clinical KC classification are required for a diagnostic and therapeutic consensus in KC. © 2023 by the Turkish Ophthalmological Association/Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology published by Galenos Publishing House. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | RD16/0008/0012; European Regional Development Fund, ERDF | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Turkish Ophthalmology Society | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Pentacam | en_US |
dc.subject | Scheimpflug | en_US |
dc.subject | subclinical keratoconus | en_US |
dc.subject | Article | en_US |
dc.subject | astigmatism | en_US |
dc.subject | best corrected visual acuity | en_US |
dc.subject | biomechanics | en_US |
dc.subject | cell density | en_US |
dc.subject | controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject | corneal thickness | en_US |
dc.subject | cross-sectional study | en_US |
dc.subject | eye movement | en_US |
dc.subject | gray matter | en_US |
dc.subject | human | en_US |
dc.subject | keratoconus | en_US |
dc.subject | keratometry | en_US |
dc.subject | mild keratoconus | en_US |
dc.subject | optical coherence tomography | en_US |
dc.subject | pachymetry | en_US |
dc.subject | phacoemulsification | en_US |
dc.subject | phenotype | en_US |
dc.subject | prospective study | en_US |
dc.subject | receiver operating characteristic | en_US |
dc.subject | refraction error | en_US |
dc.subject | retrospective study | en_US |
dc.subject | scoring system | en_US |
dc.subject | sensitivity and specificity | en_US |
dc.subject | slit lamp microscopy | en_US |
dc.subject | spine fusion | en_US |
dc.subject | subclinical keratoconus | en_US |
dc.subject | topography | en_US |
dc.subject | visual acuity | en_US |
dc.subject | visual field | en_US |
dc.subject | corneal pachymetry | en_US |
dc.subject | Corneal Pachymetry | en_US |
dc.subject | Corneal Topography | en_US |
dc.subject | Cross-Sectional Studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Keratoconus | en_US |
dc.subject | ROC Curve | en_US |
dc.title | Revisiting Pentacam Parameters in the Diagnosis of Subclinical and Mild Keratoconus Based on Different Grading System Definitions | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 53 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 324 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 335 | en_US |
dc.department | Pamukkale University | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.68188 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.authorscopusid | 55298699700 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 57210854684 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 57517522000 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 55976898900 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38008938 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85180541878 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001133160800005 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | … | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 14.01. Surgical Medicine | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 14.01. Surgical Medicine | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 14.01. Surgical Medicine | - |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
TJO-53-324-En.pdf | 4.92 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Page view(s)
82
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Download(s)
34
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.