Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/56711
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkyürek, A.-
dc.contributor.authorAğdağ, O.N.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-24T14:32:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-24T14:32:18Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn0925-8574-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107190-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/56711-
dc.description.abstractConstructed wetlands (CsW) are being frequently used nowadays for the treatment purpose of rural domestic wastewaters. In this study CsWs and sequencing batch reactor (SBR) package type biological treatment plants are compared in terms of treatment capacity, cost and efficiency in rural sites of Denizli City, Türkiye. Although initial investment costs are almost equal, CsWs are much superior on stability, efficiency, operational costs and labor requirements. In this full-scale study, biological oxygen demand (BOD5) removal efficiency was 92% in CsW, and 85% in SBR, while suspended solid (SS) removal efficiency was 88% in CsW and 81% in SBR. The investment and operating costs of CsW are 179,575–0.018 USD/cubic meters and 128,886–0.13 USD/cubic meters for SBR, respectively. The CsW method comes to the fore both in terms of low operating cost, energy consumption, and sustainability as well as increasing biological diversity and complying with discharge standards. Due to these advantages, CsW is preferred to SBR. © 2024en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Engineeringen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectConstructed wetlanden_US
dc.subjectCosten_US
dc.subjectCsWen_US
dc.subjectPackage type biological treatment plantsen_US
dc.subjectRural sitesen_US
dc.subjectSBRen_US
dc.subjectSequencing batch reactorsen_US
dc.subjectWastewateren_US
dc.subjectBatch reactorsen_US
dc.subjectBiochemical engineeringen_US
dc.subjectBiochemical oxygen demanden_US
dc.subjectBiological water treatmenten_US
dc.subjectEnergy utilizationen_US
dc.subjectInvestmentsen_US
dc.subjectOperating costsen_US
dc.subjectRural areasen_US
dc.subjectWastewater treatmenten_US
dc.subjectBiological treatment plantsen_US
dc.subjectConstructed wetlanden_US
dc.subjectDomestic wastewateren_US
dc.subjectPackage type biological treatment planten_US
dc.subjectRemoval efficienciesen_US
dc.subjectRural siteen_US
dc.subjectSequencing batch reactorsen_US
dc.subjectTreatment costsen_US
dc.subjectWetlandsen_US
dc.titleComparison of constructed wetlands and package type sequencing batch biological treatment plants in rural areas in terms of efficiency and cost in a full-scale exampleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume201en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107190-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid58862746600-
dc.authorscopusid6507660843-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85183951463en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001179790700001en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.dept10.01. Environmental Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

50
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.