Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57292
Title: | Low relapse rate in patients with giant cell arteritis in a multi-centre retrospective Turkish Registry | Authors: | Alibaz-Öner, F. Kelesoglu, B. Balci, M.A. Yardimci, G.K. Armağan, B. Kiliç, L. Karakaş, Özlem Erden, Abdulsamet Bilge, Sule Yasar Kardaş, Riza Can Küçük, Hamit Zengin, Orhan Tasci, Murat Kocaer, Sinem Burcu Yavuz, Sule Dogru, Atalay Şahin, Mehmet Bayindir, Ozun Sevik, Gizem Ertürk, Zeynep Alpay-Kanitez, Nilüfer Gogebakan, Hasan Tezcan, Mehmet Engin Oksuz, Mustafa Ferhat Cefle, Ayse Kucuksahin, Orhan Yazici, Ayten Kasapoglu, Esen Bes, Cemal Unal, Ali Ugur Dalkiliç, Ediz Çetin, Gözde Yildirim Aksu, Kenan Keser, Gokhan Onen, Fatos Çobankara, Veli Kisacik, Bünyamin Onat, Ahmet Mesut Öztürk, Mehmet Akif Kaşifoğlu, Timucin Omma, Ahmet Karadag, Omer Ates, Askin Direskeneli, Haner |
Keywords: | giant cell arteritis glucocorticoid sparing agents glucocorticoids relapse rate acute phase protein glucocorticoid methotrexate methylprednisolone tocilizumab glucocorticoid immunosuppressive agent aged Article blood vessel biopsy cohort analysis female follow up giant cell arteritis headache histopathology human human tissue major clinical study male medical record recurrence risk retrospective study rheumatic polymyalgia tertiary care center Turkey (republic) clinical trial giant cell arteritis middle aged multicenter study recurrent disease register remission time factor treatment outcome turkey (bird) very elderly Aged Aged, 80 and over Female Giant Cell Arteritis Glucocorticoids Humans Immunosuppressive Agents Male Middle Aged Recurrence Registries Remission Induction Retrospective Studies Time Factors Treatment Outcome Turkey |
Publisher: | Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S. | Abstract: | Objective Glucocorticoids (GC) are widely accepted as the standard first-line treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, relapse rates are reported up to 80% on GC-only protocol arms in controlled trials of tocilizumab and abatacept in 12-24 months. Herein, we aimed to assess the real-life relapse rates retrospectively in patients with GCA from Turkey. Methods We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with GCA diagnosed according to ACR 1990 criteria from tertiary rheumatology centres in Turkey. All clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Relapse was defined as any new manifestation or increased acute-phase response leading to the change of the GC dose or use of a new therapeutic agent by the treating physician. Results The study included 330 (F/M: 196/134) patients with GCA. The mean age at disease onset was 68.9±9 years. The most frequent symptom was headache. Polymyalgia rheumatica was also present in 81 (24.5%) patients. Elevation of acute phase reactants (ESR>50 mm/h or CRP>5 mg/l) was absent in 25 (7.6%) patients at diagnosis. Temporal artery biopsy was available in 241 (73%) patients, and 180 of them had positive histopathological findings for GCA. For remission induction, GC pulses (250-1000 methylprednisolone mg/3-7 days) were given to 69 (20.9%) patients, with further 0.5-1 mg/kg/day prednisolone continued in the whole group. Immunosuppressives as GC-sparing agents were used in 252 (76.4%) patients. During a follow-up of a median 26.5 (6-190) months, relapses occurred in 49 (18.8%) patients. No confounding factor was observed in relapse rates. GC treatment could be stopped in only 62 (23.8%) patients. Additionally, GC-related side effects developed in 64 (24.6%) patients, and 141 (66.2%) had at least one Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) damage item present during follow-up. Conclusion In this first multi-centre series of GCA from Turkey, we observed that only one-fifth of patients had relapses during a mean follow-up of 26 months, with 76.4% given a GC-sparing IS agent at diagnosis. At the end of follow-up, GC-related side effects developed in one-fourth of patients. Our results suggest that patients with GCA had a low relapse rate in real-life experience of a multi-centre retrospective Turkish registry, however with a significant presence of GC-associated side effects during follow-up. © 2024 Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/zr7s0g https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57292 |
ISSN: | 0392-856X |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Dec 21, 2024
Page view(s)
54
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.