Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57292
Title: Low relapse rate in patients with giant cell arteritis in a multi-centre retrospective Turkish Registry
Authors: Alibaz-Öner, F.
Kelesoglu, B.
Balci, M.A.
Yardimci, G.K.
Armağan, B.
Kiliç, L.
Karakaş, Özlem
Erden, Abdulsamet
Bilge, Sule Yasar
Kardaş, Riza Can
Küçük, Hamit
Zengin, Orhan
Tasci, Murat
Kocaer, Sinem Burcu
Yavuz, Sule
Dogru, Atalay
Şahin, Mehmet
Bayindir, Ozun
Sevik, Gizem
Ertürk, Zeynep
Alpay-Kanitez, Nilüfer
Gogebakan, Hasan
Tezcan, Mehmet Engin
Oksuz, Mustafa Ferhat
Cefle, Ayse
Kucuksahin, Orhan
Yazici, Ayten
Kasapoglu, Esen
Bes, Cemal
Unal, Ali Ugur
Dalkiliç, Ediz
Çetin, Gözde Yildirim
Aksu, Kenan
Keser, Gokhan
Onen, Fatos
Çobankara, Veli
Kisacik, Bünyamin
Onat, Ahmet Mesut
Öztürk, Mehmet Akif
Kaşifoğlu, Timucin
Omma, Ahmet
Karadag, Omer
Ates, Askin
Direskeneli, Haner
Keywords: giant cell arteritis
glucocorticoid sparing agents
glucocorticoids
relapse rate
acute phase protein
glucocorticoid
methotrexate
methylprednisolone
tocilizumab
glucocorticoid
immunosuppressive agent
aged
Article
blood vessel biopsy
cohort analysis
female
follow up
giant cell arteritis
headache
histopathology
human
human tissue
major clinical study
male
medical record
recurrence risk
retrospective study
rheumatic polymyalgia
tertiary care center
Turkey (republic)
clinical trial
giant cell arteritis
middle aged
multicenter study
recurrent disease
register
remission
time factor
treatment outcome
turkey (bird)
very elderly
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Giant Cell Arteritis
Glucocorticoids
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
Male
Middle Aged
Recurrence
Registries
Remission Induction
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Turkey
Publisher: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.
Abstract: Objective Glucocorticoids (GC) are widely accepted as the standard first-line treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, relapse rates are reported up to 80% on GC-only protocol arms in controlled trials of tocilizumab and abatacept in 12-24 months. Herein, we aimed to assess the real-life relapse rates retrospectively in patients with GCA from Turkey. Methods We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with GCA diagnosed according to ACR 1990 criteria from tertiary rheumatology centres in Turkey. All clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Relapse was defined as any new manifestation or increased acute-phase response leading to the change of the GC dose or use of a new therapeutic agent by the treating physician. Results The study included 330 (F/M: 196/134) patients with GCA. The mean age at disease onset was 68.9±9 years. The most frequent symptom was headache. Polymyalgia rheumatica was also present in 81 (24.5%) patients. Elevation of acute phase reactants (ESR>50 mm/h or CRP>5 mg/l) was absent in 25 (7.6%) patients at diagnosis. Temporal artery biopsy was available in 241 (73%) patients, and 180 of them had positive histopathological findings for GCA. For remission induction, GC pulses (250-1000 methylprednisolone mg/3-7 days) were given to 69 (20.9%) patients, with further 0.5-1 mg/kg/day prednisolone continued in the whole group. Immunosuppressives as GC-sparing agents were used in 252 (76.4%) patients. During a follow-up of a median 26.5 (6-190) months, relapses occurred in 49 (18.8%) patients. No confounding factor was observed in relapse rates. GC treatment could be stopped in only 62 (23.8%) patients. Additionally, GC-related side effects developed in 64 (24.6%) patients, and 141 (66.2%) had at least one Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) damage item present during follow-up. Conclusion In this first multi-centre series of GCA from Turkey, we observed that only one-fifth of patients had relapses during a mean follow-up of 26 months, with 76.4% given a GC-sparing IS agent at diagnosis. At the end of follow-up, GC-related side effects developed in one-fourth of patients. Our results suggest that patients with GCA had a low relapse rate in real-life experience of a multi-centre retrospective Turkish registry, however with a significant presence of GC-associated side effects during follow-up. © 2024 Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.. All rights reserved.
URI: https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/zr7s0g
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57292
ISSN: 0392-856X
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.