Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57959
Title: Superficial femoral artery endovascular therapy: 12-month primary patency rates of contemporary endovascular devices from 25,051 patients
Authors: Marmagkiolis, K.
Kilic, I.D.
Inanc, I.H.
Iliescu, C.
Ajmal, M.
Cilingiroglu, M.
Keywords: Endovascular therapies
Peripheral arterial disease
Publisher: Cliggott Publishing Co.
Abstract: Background. Approximately 5.8 million people experience peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the United States today. Superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease is the most common cause of symptomatic PAD. New-generation nitinol stents, drug-coated stents, drug-coated balloons (DCB), covered stents, and directional or orbital atherectomy devices have shown promising results. However, clinical equipoise persists regarding the optimal selection of devices, largely attributable to the different inclusion criteria, study populations, length of lesions treated, definitions of "patency" and "restenosis," and follow-up methods in the up-To-date pivotal trials. Methods. A prospective protocol was developed. We performed a literature search using PubMed from January 2011 to July 2021. All published articles including endovascular interventions in the SFA with reported 12-month "primary patency" rates as endpoints were included. Results. We identified 25,051 patients in 124 studies reporting 12-month primary patency rates in patients with SFA disease. Primary patency rates were (weighted average) 82.6% for drug-eluting stents, 77.2% for drug-coated balloons, 75.2% for covered stents, 73.9% for nitinol self-expanding stents, 66.1% for atherectomy, and 44.5% for bare balloon angioplasty. Conclusion. The most frequently used endovascular devices yielded various 12-month primary patency rates ranging from 44.5% to 82.6%. The increased variation in inclusion criteria, lesion length, and complexity of lesions between studies does not allow direct comparison between the individual devices. Larger randomized trials in specific patient populations comparing these modalities are needed well before we can make proper recommendations on the superiority of one device over the other. © 2022 HMP Global.
URI: https://doi.org/
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/57959
ISSN: 1042-3931
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.