Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/59314
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkdoğan, S.-
dc.contributor.authorÖziç, M.Ü.-
dc.contributor.authorTassoker, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-22T21:38:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-22T21:38:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040462-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/59314-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objective: This study aimed to develop an AI-supported clinical tool to evaluate the difficulty of mandibular third molar extractions based on panoramic radiographs. Methods: A dataset of 2000 panoramic radiographs collected between 2023 and 2024 was annotated by an oral radiologist using bounding boxes. YOLO11 sub-models were trained and tested for three basic scenarios according to the Pederson Index criteria, taking into account Winter (angulation) and Pell and Gregory (ramus relationship and depth). For each scenario, the YOLO11 sub-models were trained using 80% of the data for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. Model performance was assessed using precision, recall, F1 score, and mean Average Precision (mAP) metrics, and different graphs. Results: YOLO11 sub-models (nano, small, medium, large, extra-large) showed high accuracy and similar behavior in all scenarios. For the calculation of the Pederson index, nano for Winter (average training mAP@0.50 = 0.963; testing mAP@0.50 = 0.975), nano for class (average training mAP@0.50 = 0.979; testing mAP@0.50 = 0.965), and medium for level (average training mAP@0.50 = 0.977; testing mAP@0.50 = 0.989) from the Pell and Gregory categories were selected as optimal sub-models. Three scenarios were run consecutively on panoramic images, and slightly difficult, moderately difficult, and very difficult Pederson indexes were obtained according to the scores. The results were evaluated by an oral radiologist, and the AI system performed successfully in terms of Pederson index determination with 97.00% precision, 94.55% recall, and 95.76% F1 score. Conclusions: The YOLO11-supported clinical tool demonstrated high accuracy and reliability in assessing mandibular third molar extraction difficulty on panoramic radiographs. These models were integrated into a GUI for clinical use, offering dentists a simple tool for estimating extraction difficulty, and improving decision-making and patient management. © 2025 by the authors.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, TÜBİTAK, (2210-C); Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, TÜBİTAKen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnosticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Third Molar Extractionen_US
dc.subjectOral Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPanoramic Radiographyen_US
dc.subjectPederson Difficulty Indexen_US
dc.subjectYolo11en_US
dc.titleDevelopment of an Ai-Supported Clinical Tool for Assessing Mandibular Third Molar Tooth Extraction Difficulty Using Panoramic Radiographs and Yolo11 Sub-Modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics15040462-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid59654117800-
dc.authorscopusid56246508200-
dc.authorscopusid57194135354-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85218892718-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept20.03. Biomedical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.