Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/60012
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDereli, Ayse Kurtulus-
dc.contributor.authorIzci, Abdulkadir-
dc.contributor.authorCenk, Hulya-
dc.contributor.authorSanli, Berna-
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Kemalettin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-25T19:10:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-25T19:10:02Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2717-6398-
dc.identifier.issn2651-5164-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/turkderm.galenos.2025.89238-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/60012-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Design: This study aims to evaluate the significance of physicians' obligations under contracts of work in the context of medical malpractice claims related to minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Additionally, it will address the criteria and methodologies employed in the legal assessment of disputes arising from these procedures, particularly in light of the recent rulings by Supreme Courts. Furthermore, it will emphasize the key considerations from a forensic medical perspective. Materials and Methods: The results of the search conducted using the keywords "botox, aesthetics", "filling, aesthetics", "laser, epilation", "laser, aesthetics", "laser rejuvenation", "peeling", "derma pen", "mesotherapy", "platelet-rich plasma", and "hair transplantation" from the "https://legalbank.net/arama/mahkeme-kararlari" website revealed that all decisions on medical malpractice as a result of dermatological aesthetic procedures were included in the study. The characteristics of the procedure, the resulting damage, and the trial court and supreme court decisions were evaluated. Results: Seventy-four decisions that met the pre-established screening criteria were identified. Most decisions (83.8%, n=62) were related to laser epilation procedures. The findings revealed that the most frequent locations for the procedures were beauty centers and beauty salons, representing 58.1% of the cases. It was determined that 78.3% (n=58) of the judgments were reversed. Among the reasons for reversal, deficiencies in expert reports were noteworthy. Conclusion: A review of medical malpractice claims has revealed that most dermatological aesthetic procedures and laser epilation applications are associated with beauty centers. The decisions of the supreme courts emphasize the importance of the practitioner's authority, the obligation to inform, the management of complications, and whether the contract of work and the supervision and control responsibility of the responsible manager achieved the promised result.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCosmetic Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectFillingen_US
dc.subjectBotoxen_US
dc.subjectEpilationen_US
dc.subjectMalpracticeen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Medical Malpractice Claims Arising From Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures in the Context of Supreme Court Decisionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume59en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/turkderm.galenos.2025.89238-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorscopusid12141184800-
dc.authorscopusid57414409600-
dc.authorscopusid56811496900-
dc.authorscopusid6507169785-
dc.authorscopusid6506945510-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001554925-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001461837800001-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.