Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/60071
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBakay, Ozge Sevil Karstarli-
dc.contributor.authorBakay, Umut-
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Tugba Izci-
dc.contributor.authorOk, Zeynep Dundar-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-25T19:11:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-25T19:11:44Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2667-663X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/ACAM.22563-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/60071-
dc.descriptionKarstarli Bakay, Ozge Sevil/0000-0002-1523-3187en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is common in psoriasis patients but is sometimes overlooked. Delayed diagnosis of PsA can lead to joint erosion, axial damage, and impaired physical function. Screening tools are essential for early diagnosis and selecting the right patients for rheumatological evaluation. We aimed to develop a practical and comprehensive screening tool using the ChatGPT and compare its performance with that of validated questionnaires. Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on adult psoriasis patients who had musculoskeletal complaints but were not diagnosed with PsA. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered PsA screening (AIPS) was developed by selecting questions on peripheral arthritis, axial inflammation, and enthesitis from multivariate analyses conducted via Chat GPT 4.0. The Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST), the Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients Questionnaire (EARP), and the AIPS questionnaires were completed concurrently by all psoriasis patients. All patients were evaluated for PSA diagnosis by three rheumatologists who were blinded to the questionnaire responses. Results: The study included 199 patients, 115 (57.8%) of whom were female. The mean age was 44.4 +/- 13.3 years. PSA was detected in 84 psoriasis patients (42.2%). The sensitivity of the EARP questionnaire, 98%, was greater than those of the AIPS and PEST questionnaires, which had 92% and 83% sensitivity values, respectively. However, the AIPS had a higher specificity at 96% than did the PEST and EARP, with specificities of 91% and 80%, respectively. Discussion: The AIPS questionnaire is an effective tool for screening for PsA, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity. Artificial intelligence can help screen patients, saving time and money.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBayrakol Medical Publisheren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectPsoriatic Arthritis Screening Toolen_US
dc.subjectEarly Arthritis For Psoriatic Patientsen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectChatgpten_US
dc.subjectPesten_US
dc.subjectEarpen_US
dc.titleAi-Powered Screening for Psoriatic Arthritis: a Comparative Study With Existing Toolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage203en_US
dc.identifier.endpage208en_US
dc.departmentPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.authoridKarstarli Bakay, Ozge Sevil/0000-0002-1523-3187-
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/ACAM.22563-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.authorwosidIzci Duran, Tugba/Hge-5185-2022-
dc.authorwosidKarstarlı Bakay, Özge Sevil/Ade-8177-2022-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001436661200011-
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A-
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index-
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.