Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6222
Title: | A comparison of spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for transurethral surgery: A randomized controlled trial | Authors: | Erbay, Rıza Hakan Ermumcu, O. Hancı, Volkan Atalay, Habip |
Keywords: | Anesthesia, Spinal Hyperbaric levopubivacaine Transurethral procedures bupivacaine ephedrine fentanyl levobupivacaine adult adverse outcome aged anesthesia complication anesthesia induction anesthetic recovery article dermatome dose response double blind procedure drug effect drug efficacy drug quality female headache hemodynamic monitoring human hypotension intraoperative period low drug dose major clinical study male motor nerve block nausea outcome assessment postoperative analgesia postoperative pain pruritus randomized controlled trial spinal anesthesia transurethral resection vomiting Adjuvants, Anesthesia Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthetics, Local Bupivacaine Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Double-Blind Method Fentanyl Hemodynamics Humans Male Middle Aged Pain Measurement Pain, Postoperative Transurethral Resection of Prostate Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
Abstract: | Background. The aim of this study was to compare spinal anesthesia effects of low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine and low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine for transurethral procedures. Methods. In this double-blind, randomized, controlled study, a total of 60 patients who were ASA I-III were randomized into two groups. Group B received 7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 25 µg fentanyl, and Group L received 7.5 mg hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus 25 µg fentanyl intrathecally. The onset time to T10 dermatome, times to maximum sensory and motor block levels, time to two-segment regression of sensory block, time to Bromage score zero, time to full recovery of sensory block, and hemodynamic values, as well as adverse effects, were recorded. The primary outcome was the time to complete regression of motor block. Results. The onset time of block to T10, time to maximum sensory block, and time to two-segment regression were similar in both groups. The time to maximum motor block was shorter in Group B (7 ± 3 min) than in Group L (12±5 min), (P<0.001). The time to a Bromage score of zero (recovery of motor block) was shorter in Group L (105±19 min) than in Group B (113±7 min), (P=0.04). The time to full recovery of sensory block was shorter in Group B (127±14 min) than in Group L (157±34 min), (P<0.001). The requirement for analgesia was earlier in Group B (305±50 min) than in Group L (389±146 min), (P=0.004). Conclusion. Although both techniques provide adequate spinal block and have few similar side effects for transurethral surgery, the use of low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus fentanyl may be preferable to low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine plus fentanyl because of the reduced motor block, shorter duration of motor block, longer duration of sensory block and longer time to the first requirement for analgesia. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6222 | ISSN: | 0375-9393 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
checked on Nov 10, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
checked on Nov 10, 2024
Page view(s)
80
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.