Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6322
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErgün, O.-
dc.contributor.authorHuri, E.-
dc.contributor.authorAcar, C.-
dc.contributor.authorBinbay, M.-
dc.contributor.authorZümrütbaş, A.E.-
dc.contributor.authorAcar, O.-
dc.contributor.authorÇitgez, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:05:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:05:57Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1300-5804-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/6322-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2010.033-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the aspects and thoughts of urology residents and new specialists about urology education and urology profession in Turkey. Materials and methods: Eighty three residents and new specialists were included in the survey. The survey, which was consisted of 25 questions, was fulfilled in 20 min period by the participants themselves. Results: Ninety percent (76/83) of the participants were glad to choose urology specialty, but 22.4% (17/76) of those stated that they wished to take their urology education in another institution if they had chance. Fourteen percent (9/63) finds the theoretical education of their institution sufficient. When they were asked that what possible reasons of insufficiency of institution arising from their teachers could be, the 47% (39/83) of unsatisfied participants reported that the teachers did not give lessons at education times. When they were asked whether they preferred to practice their profession in our country or abroad, 57% preferred to practice in our country and 14% had no preference. Conclusion: The residents taking urology specialty education are satisfied with their work in general. Considering the efforts of education institutions to become accredited, the reorganization of residents' report cards is suggested. It is very challenging that 47% of the educators do not give theoretical lessons to residents. Practicing urology in our country in relation with Ministry of Health has not yet lost its attraction among the urologist of near future.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Uroloji Dergisien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccreditationen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectResidenten_US
dc.subjectUrologyen_US
dc.titleA look to the urology education and urology profession in turkey: Evaluation of survey resultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage298-
dc.identifier.startpage298en_US
dc.identifier.endpage301en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tud.2010.033-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78149377586en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000420539500014en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.dept14.01. Surgical Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
70d36b63-5358-4746-a724-5a3be9f10e84.pdf314.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

34
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Download(s)

198
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.