Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6442
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yağız, Saffet | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gokceoglu, C. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-16T12:07:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-16T12:07:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0957-4174 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6442 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.046 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Brittleness is one of the most crucial rock features for underground excavation and design considerations in rock mass. Direct standard testing method for measuring rock brittleness, the combination of rock properties rather than only one rock parameter have not available yet. Therefore, it is indirectly calculated as a function of some rock properties such as rock strength by using various ratios and prediction tools. The aim of this study is to estimate the rock brittleness by constructing fuzzy inference system and nonlinear regression analysis. For this purpose, a dataset established by utilizing the relevant laboratory rock tests (i.e., punch penetration, uniaxial compressive strength, Brazilian tensile strength and unit weight of rock) at the Earth Mechanics Institute of Colorado School of Mines in the USA on the rock samples assembled from 48 tunnels projects throughout the world. Running the established models, the performance values such as RMSE, VAF, absolute error and coefficient of cross-correlation were computed for developed models. The VAF and RMSE indices were calculated as 89.8% and 2.97 for the nonlinear multiple regression model and 83.1% and 3.82 for fuzzy model, respectively. As a result, these indices revealed that the prediction performance of the nonlinear multiple regression model is higher than that of the fuzzy inference system model. However, it is concluded that both constructed models exhibited a high performance according to the obtained prediction values. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Expert Systems with Applications | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Brittleness | en_US |
dc.subject | Fuzzy inference system | en_US |
dc.subject | Nonlinear regression | en_US |
dc.subject | Absolute error | en_US |
dc.subject | Colorado School of Mines | en_US |
dc.subject | Cross correlations | en_US |
dc.subject | Data sets | en_US |
dc.subject | Design considerations | en_US |
dc.subject | Developed model | en_US |
dc.subject | Fuzzy inference systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Fuzzy models | en_US |
dc.subject | Multiple regression model | en_US |
dc.subject | Non-linear regression analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Nonlinear regression models | en_US |
dc.subject | Performance value | en_US |
dc.subject | Prediction performance | en_US |
dc.subject | Prediction tools | en_US |
dc.subject | Punch penetration | en_US |
dc.subject | Rock brittleness | en_US |
dc.subject | Rock properties | en_US |
dc.subject | Rock sample | en_US |
dc.subject | Rock strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Standard testing | en_US |
dc.subject | Underground excavation | en_US |
dc.subject | Uniaxial compressive strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Unit weight | en_US |
dc.subject | Compressive strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Excavation | en_US |
dc.subject | Fracture mechanics | en_US |
dc.subject | Fuzzy inference | en_US |
dc.subject | Fuzzy systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Metal analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Mining | en_US |
dc.subject | Model structures | en_US |
dc.subject | Plasticity | en_US |
dc.subject | Regression analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Statistical tests | en_US |
dc.subject | Tensile strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Rocks | en_US |
dc.title | Application of fuzzy inference system and nonlinear regression models for predicting rock brittleness | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 37 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 2265 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 2265 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 2272 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.046 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-70449523078 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000272846500051 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
dc.owner | Pamukkale University | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 10.08. Geological Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Mühendislik Fakültesi Koleksiyonu Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
121
checked on Nov 16, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
112
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Page view(s)
42
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.