Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6757
Title: | Hyperbaric Oxygen as Adjunctive Therapy in Experimental Mediastinitis | Authors: | Turhan, Vedat. Saçar, Suzan. Uzun, Günalp. Saçar, Mustafa. Yildiz, S. Ceran, N. Gorur, R. |
Keywords: | hyperbaric oxygen therapy linezolid mediastinitis teicoplanin vancomycin animal experiment animal model animal tissue antibiotic therapy article bacterial count controlled study drug efficacy experimental infection hyperbaric oxygen loading drug dose male methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nonhuman priority journal rat Staphylococcus infection sternotomy Acetamides Animals Anti-Infective Agents Combined Modality Therapy Hyperbaric Oxygenation Male Mediastinitis Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Oxazolidinones Rats Rats, Wistar Staphylococcal Infections Teicoplanin Vancomycin |
Abstract: | Background: Mediastinitis is a dreaded complication of cardiac surgical procedures. The purpose of our study was to research the role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) in the treatment of experimental mediastinitis and to investigate whether it potentiates the antibiotic effects of linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin. Methods: The study included nine groups; an uncontaminated and a contaminated untreated control groups, and seven contaminated groups that received HBO or systemic antibiotics with linezolid, vancomycin, or teicoplanin, or a combination therapy consisting of one of these antibiotics and HBO. There were six adult male Wistar rats in each group. Contaminated groups were inoculated with 0.5 mL 108 CFU/mL methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the mediastinal and in the sternal layers. The antibiotic treatment continued 7 d. Twelve hours later at the end of the treatment, the rats were sacrificed, a sternotomy was performed for each rat and tissue samples from the upper ends of the sternum were aseptically obtained and evaluated microbiologically. Results: There was no difference between the therapeutic efficacy of linezolid, teicoplanin, or vancomycin (P > 0.05). When the groups were analyzed separately, treatment with a combination of HBO and antibiotic therapy reduced the bacterial count in comparison with HBO or antibiotic treatment alone (P < 0.05). The combination of teicoplanin or vancomycin and HBO, respectively, was not more effective in reducing the bacterial count in comparison with the combination of linezolid and HBO (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Linezolid and teicoplanin therapy was found as effective as standard vancomycin therapy for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) mediastinitis. Adjunctive HBO offered additional benefit to the antibiotic treatment of mediastinitis. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6757 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.08.031 |
ISSN: | 0022-4804 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
27
checked on Oct 13, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
24
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Page view(s)
38
checked on Aug 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.