Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6757
Title: Hyperbaric Oxygen as Adjunctive Therapy in Experimental Mediastinitis
Authors: Turhan, Vedat.
Saçar, Suzan.
Uzun, Günalp.
Saçar, Mustafa.
Yildiz, S.
Ceran, N.
Gorur, R.
Keywords: hyperbaric oxygen therapy
linezolid
mediastinitis
teicoplanin
vancomycin
animal experiment
animal model
animal tissue
antibiotic therapy
article
bacterial count
controlled study
drug efficacy
experimental infection
hyperbaric oxygen
loading drug dose
male
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
nonhuman
priority journal
rat
Staphylococcus infection
sternotomy
Acetamides
Animals
Anti-Infective Agents
Combined Modality Therapy
Hyperbaric Oxygenation
Male
Mediastinitis
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Oxazolidinones
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Staphylococcal Infections
Teicoplanin
Vancomycin
Abstract: Background: Mediastinitis is a dreaded complication of cardiac surgical procedures. The purpose of our study was to research the role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) in the treatment of experimental mediastinitis and to investigate whether it potentiates the antibiotic effects of linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin. Methods: The study included nine groups; an uncontaminated and a contaminated untreated control groups, and seven contaminated groups that received HBO or systemic antibiotics with linezolid, vancomycin, or teicoplanin, or a combination therapy consisting of one of these antibiotics and HBO. There were six adult male Wistar rats in each group. Contaminated groups were inoculated with 0.5 mL 108 CFU/mL methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the mediastinal and in the sternal layers. The antibiotic treatment continued 7 d. Twelve hours later at the end of the treatment, the rats were sacrificed, a sternotomy was performed for each rat and tissue samples from the upper ends of the sternum were aseptically obtained and evaluated microbiologically. Results: There was no difference between the therapeutic efficacy of linezolid, teicoplanin, or vancomycin (P > 0.05). When the groups were analyzed separately, treatment with a combination of HBO and antibiotic therapy reduced the bacterial count in comparison with HBO or antibiotic treatment alone (P < 0.05). The combination of teicoplanin or vancomycin and HBO, respectively, was not more effective in reducing the bacterial count in comparison with the combination of linezolid and HBO (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Linezolid and teicoplanin therapy was found as effective as standard vancomycin therapy for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) mediastinitis. Adjunctive HBO offered additional benefit to the antibiotic treatment of mediastinitis. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6757
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.08.031
ISSN: 0022-4804
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on Oct 13, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Page view(s)

38
checked on Aug 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.