Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6843
Title: Complementary-alternative medicine among cancer patients in the western region of Turkey
Authors: Tarhan, O.
Alacacioglu, A.
Somali, I.
Sipahi, H.
Zencir, Mehmet
Oztop, I.
Dirioz, M.
Keywords: Cancer
Complementary treatment
Complementary-alternative
Medicine
herbaceous agent
alternative medicine
article
cancer patient
controlled study
human
interview
major clinical study
nutritional support
recurrent disease
Turkey (republic)
Urtica dioica
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Complementary Therapies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
Patient Satisfaction
Phytotherapy
Prognosis
Questionnaires
Turkey
Young Adult
Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) applications and factors affecting its use among cancer patients in the western region of Turkey. Patients and methods: Face-to-face interview technique was used. Patients were asked to answer a questionnaire about their socio-demographic features, their level of knowledge about the disease and CAM application features. Results: 220 adult cancer patients (79 male) were evaluated. Ninety-three (42.3%) were using at least one CAM method, the most common being herbal products which were preferred by 81 (36.3%) patients. Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) was the most commonly used herbal product. Next was nutritional support, preferred by 45 (20.3%) patients. Eighty- nine (44.5%) of 200 patients who knew the diagnosis and 4 of 20 (20%) who did not were using CAM. In the patient group with awareness of the diagnosis, CAM application was significantly higher (p=0.034). CAM applications were detected in 34 of 70 (48.5%) patients with recurrent disease while 54 of 150 (36%) patients without recurrent disease were using CAM. The CAM applications were significantly higher in the group with recurrent disease (p=0.006). Fifty-three of 103 (51.4%) patients who had advanced disease were using CAM, while only 40 of 117 (34.1%) patients with local or locally advanced disease were using it. CAM applications were significantly higher in the group with advanced disease (p=0.030). Besides, knowing the diagnosis and disease recurrence were also independent risk factors for CAM usage [odds ratio (OR): 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-9.8 and OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2-4.0 respectively]. As a result, nearly half of the patients (42.3%) in this region were using at least one of the CAM methods. Conclusion: The severity of the disease (recurrence and dissemination) and patients 'awareness of the diagnosis were the most important factors affecting the CAM applications. © 2009 Zerbinis Medical Publications.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/6843
ISSN: 1107-0625
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

37
checked on Jun 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

32
checked on Jun 25, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.