Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11499/7453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKocy¸igit, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Selçuk-
dc.contributor.authorBayram, R.-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, I.-
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, N.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T12:29:38Z
dc.date.available2019-08-16T12:29:38Z
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0931-041X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11499/7453-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-014-2766-y-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The detection of renal scars is of paramount importance for optimal clinical management of patients with urinary tract infection (UTI) and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of unenhanced magnetic resonance urography (MRU) and Tc-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (Tc-DMSA) scintigraphy to dectect renal scars. Methods: Unenhanced MRU and Tc-DMSA scintigraphy were performed in 49 children (10 boys, 39 girls; mean age 7.4±4.2 years, range 1-15 years) with documented VUR. MR imaging scans were obtained within 7 days after voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and Tc-DMSA scintigraphy. The diagnostic performance of MRU in renal scar detection was calculated relative to that of the Tc-DMSA scan. Results: The renal scar detection rate of Tc-DMSA scintigraphy and unenhanced MRU in kidneys with VUR was 32.4 and 25.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MRU in the detection of renal scars was 80 and 82.6% in kidneys with VUR, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in lesion detection between MRU and Tc-DMSA scintigraphy (P >0.05).MRU and Tc-DMSA scintigraphy showed good agreement (? = 0.60). Conclusions: Unenhanced MRU is a robust technique for the morphologic assessment of the urinary system and detection of renal scars. The lack of radiation and contrast material makes this technique a much safer alternative to scintigraphy in children with VUR, particularly in those who require follow-up scanning and, consequently, considerable radiation exposure. © IPNA 2014.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPediatric Nephrologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectKidneyen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectScintigraphyen_US
dc.subjectUrinary tract infectionsen_US
dc.subjectUrographyen_US
dc.subjectVesicoureteral refluxen_US
dc.subjectsuccimer tc 99men_US
dc.subjectacute pyelonephritisen_US
dc.subjectadolescenten_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectchilden_US
dc.subjectchildhood diseaseen_US
dc.subjectclinical articleen_US
dc.subjectcomparative effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdata analysis softwareen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracyen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic test accuracy studyen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjecthorseshoe kidneyen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectimage analysisen_US
dc.subjectintermethod comparisonen_US
dc.subjectkidney scaren_US
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance urographyen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmicturition cystourethrographyen_US
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectnuclear magnetic resonance scanneren_US
dc.subjectpredictive valueen_US
dc.subjectpriority journalen_US
dc.subjectscintigraphyen_US
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subjectureteroceleen_US
dc.subjecturographyen_US
dc.subjectvesicoureteral refluxen_US
dc.subjectCicatrixen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic useen_US
dc.subjectinfanten_US
dc.subjectpathologyen_US
dc.subjectpreschool childen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectVesico-Ureteral Refluxen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectChild, Preschoolen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectInfanten_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectTechnetium Tc 99m Dimercaptosuccinic Aciden_US
dc.titleEfficacy of magnetic resonance urography in detecting renal scars in children with vesicoureteral refluxen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1215
dc.identifier.startpage1215en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1220en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9415-1640-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00467-014-2766-y-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.pmid24500707en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84901651999en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000336434600013en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
dc.ownerPamukkale University-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept14.02. Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Tıp Fakültesi Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Jun 29, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on Jul 1, 2024

Page view(s)

78
checked on May 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.